|
||||
|
Issue 131, 11 July 2003
|
||||
|
A vision for the future
Reporter editor Tanya Reed in conversation
with the Rector What are the most important things for the College to
get right in coming months? We have to make sure we are going to come out on top. Success
will then lead to new initiatives. Creating institutes is one such initiative. The maths institute
and bioengineering institute will both be places where we should be
able to attract the best minds in the world. If we constantly aim
to build our reputation in areas such as these, people will view
Imperial as being amongst the very best. We're currently making tremendous progress when it comes to
upgrading the estate. We're spending a lot of money during the next
few years to try to build and refurbish as quickly as possible and
so provide an environment fit for world-class academic
pursuits. How do you feel about student fees? It's irresponsible to play with something as important as higher
education in this way. If we are going to deliver high quality
education, somebody's got to pay for it. If it's not the taxpayer,
the recipient has to pay. What do you think about possible changes in the way
research will be assessed and funded? The Roberts Review has asked whether the RAE in its present form
is still sensible and if not what should replace it. Due to grade
inflation, we need a new structure that allows different
institutions to do different things. We're not all the same. Some universities offer international
quality research and others conduct research which has impact at
the national or local level. All should be able to apply in
different ways and not need to compete with each other. That's
realistic and would provide a multi-tiered system which is exactly
what you want in any environment - different things for different
customers. We've got to prepare ourselves to get Imperial into the top tier
of the research quality assessment because that is where we will
continue to make our contribution. What is the thinking behind the Support Services
Project? It's very important therefore that we put our management on a
good footing. So we have brought in a highly-regarded consulting
group to work with people from both the academic and support
services side and look at the best way of making the College
operate better. That's good for everybody; there's no question today that some
of the services we offer are not perfect and there's quite a lot of
duplication. What we have to do is make sure that in this modern
age, we're running an efficient and effective operation and
releasing academics' time for academic work. In an article in the Financial Times, you mention
solving the world's problems 'will require teams of researchers
from different disciplines working together.' How successful are we
at doing that and how do you measure such success? The quality of our interdisciplinary work is well recognised by
big companies funding long term research. GSK, Shell, BP,
Mitsubishi and the Singapore government are working with us. The
Gates Foundation gift to the Schistosomiasis programme is a good
example of how Imperial is seen as a powerhouse in areas where we
have disciplines that can be brought to bear on major problems. You'll only solve the great problems if you coordinate the
efforts of excellent people. It's no good having a few good
physicists and half a dozen people in medicine. They may be potential world beaters but by themselves they are
isolated and unable to contribute that much. Clusters of excellent
people working together can provide a very powerful
organisation. What else will help attract the best from around the
world? It's not just the Imperial estate that's good - the whole area
is a rather special environment and it's difficult to believe how
you could be any luckier. If we, in turn, can offer everything else that's first class,
the only downside then is the cost of working here, but people will
deal with that providing that everything else is right. You have worked hard to build up global connections and
where we stand in Europe. What part does being involved in
partnerships like the IDEA League and Oak Ridge Associated
Universities play in the future for Imperial? In terms of Europe, being associated with some of the top
technical universities such as ETH Zürich, RWTH Aachen and TU
Delft is important as together we have a voice to which
politicians, lawmakers and policy makers will listen. Together, we
are a great strength in Europe. That's the good thing about this relationship. It's small enough
for us to get together to have agreements, make decisions and lobby
about the way tertiary education particularly is going in Europe,
as well as funding and research. It's important to have that voice which is why the IDEA League
is so crucial. As far as the US is concerned, we have strong relationships with
many universities - the Georgia Institute of Technology is a good
example. Being the first UK university to be a member of Oak Ridge is
also vital. It brings the name of Imperial College to the attention of
Americans at a level which is important to us. The science is also very important because there are excellent
facilities at Oak Ridge to which we can have access, and of which
many people can take advantage. |
||||
|
||||
| ©2003 Imperial College London |
||||