@inproceedings{Baroni:2018,
author = {Baroni, P and Rago, A and Toni, F},
publisher = {AAAI},
title = {How many Properties do we need for Gradual Argumentation?},
url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/54318},
year = {2018}
}

Download

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - The  study  of  properties  of  gradual  evaluation  methods  inargumentation  has  received  increasing  attention  in  recentyears,  with  studies  devoted  to  various  classes  of  frame-works/methods leading to conceptually similar but formallydistinct properties in different contexts. In this paper we pro-vide a systematic analysis for this research landscape by mak-ing three main contributions. First, we identify groups of con-ceptually related properties in the literature, which can be re-garded  as  based  on  common  patterns  and,  using  these  pat-terns, we evidence that many further properties can be consid-ered. Then, we provide a simplifying and unifying perspec-tive for these properties by showing that they are all impliedby the parametric principles of (either strict or non-strict) bal-ance and monotonicity. Finally, we show that (instances of)these principles are satisfied by several quantitative argumen-tation formalisms in the literature, thus confirming their gen-eral validity and their utility to support a compact, yet com-prehensive, analysis of properties of gradual argumentation.
AU  - Baroni,P
AU  - Rago,A
AU  - Toni,F
PB  - AAAI
PY  - 2018///
TI  - How many Properties do we need for Gradual Argumentation?
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/54318
ER  - 

Download