Citation

BibTex format

@article{Bachtiar:2016:10.1016/j.conengprac.2016.07.009,
author = {Bachtiar, V and Manzie, C and Moase, WH and Kerrigan, EC},
doi = {10.1016/j.conengprac.2016.07.009},
journal = {Control Engineering Practice},
pages = {1--12},
title = {Analytical results for the multi-objective design of model-predictive control},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2016.07.009},
volume = {56},
year = {2016}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - In model-predictive control (MPC), achieving the best closed-loop performance under a given computational capacity is the underlying design consideration. This paper analyzes the MPC tuning problem with control performance and required computational capacity as competing design objectives. The proposed multi-objective design of MPC (MOD-MPC) approach extends current methods that treat control performance and the computational capacity separately – often with the latter as a fixed constraint – which requires the implementation hardware to be known a priori. The proposed approach focuses on the tuning of structural MPC parameters, namely sampling time and prediction horizon length, to produce a set of optimal choices available to the practitioner. The posed design problem is then analyzed to reveal key properties, including smoothness of the design objectives and parameter bounds, and establish certain validated guarantees. Founded on these properties, necessary and sufficient conditions for an effective and efficient optimizer are presented, leading to a specialized multi-objective optimizer for the MOD-MPC being proposed. Finally, two real-world control problems are used to illustrate the results of the tuning approach and importance of the developed conditions for an effective optimizer of the MOD-MPC problem.
AU - Bachtiar,V
AU - Manzie,C
AU - Moase,WH
AU - Kerrigan,EC
DO - 10.1016/j.conengprac.2016.07.009
EP - 12
PY - 2016///
SN - 0967-0661
SP - 1
TI - Analytical results for the multi-objective design of model-predictive control
T2 - Control Engineering Practice
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2016.07.009
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/41292
VL - 56
ER -