Latest update

USS is consulting members on the proposed changes which would see a phased increase to both member and employer contributions beginning in April 2019.

We have created a modeller so that you can enter your own salary and see the potential impact of the proposed changes. Access the modeller on this page (log in required).

Active members and staff who are eligible to join the scheme should visit the USS consultation website for more information and to submit your feedback.

The consultation will run for 60 days, closing on Friday 2 November.


Joint Expert Panel: The JEP published its first report on 13 September 2018. The report includes an assessment of the methodology, assumptions and process underpinning the 2017 valuation. The report also explores the scope for possible adjustments to the methodology which would allow the valuation to be concluded.

UCU, UUK and USS have responded to the report:

All the parties involved in the national dispute are now considering the JEP’s findings, and UUK will be consulting all USS employers on the recommendations.

Find out more about the JEP

USS Trustee cost sharing process: We asked the USS in May to give the JEP the time and independence needed to complete its work. Unfortunately the USS confirmed in an update to members in June that it had decided that it was legally constrained to run the cost sharing process in parallel to the JEP. In any case, we are firmly requesting that the USS give the JEP report due consideration before any substantive changes are made to contributions.

The USS wrote to members on 25 July 2018 to share further information on the cost sharing rule. The proposed changes would see a phased increase to both member and employer contributions beginning in April 2019. These proposals are subject to a 60-day consultation with members which will start in September.

We will continue to support the work of the JEP and hope that its report and the subsequent Joint Negotiating Committee discussions in the autumn lead to a sustainable, equitable and fair pension scheme. A prolonged period of higher contributions would require difficult choices over future priorities for pay and remuneration and would affect the affordability of the scheme for many of you.

Pay and Benefits Review: Work continues on our own Pay and Benefits Review and number of actions are already underway including a Benchmarking Working Group, led by Dean of the Faculty of Engineering, Professor Nigel Brandon. The group will review the benchmark information used to inform pay decisions and make an interim report in September. Feedback from staff raised as part of the Pay and Benefits Review process has also been taken into account during the annual Local Pay bargaining negotiations between the College and the Joint Trades Unions (JTUs).

Background

If you are a member of Imperial staff employed in roles in the Academic & Research job family and Professional, Operational and Technical grades 4-7, it is highly likely you are a member of the USS scheme because it is the College’s automatic enrolment pension scheme for staff in these roles.

400,000 staff at over 350 institutions in the UK have a USS pension. The USS is the independent body which runs the pension. Its Trustees are legally responsible for ensuring the pension fund is financially sustainable.

The Pensions Regulator (TPR) is the public body, sponsored by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), which sets the rules for all workplace pension schemes, including the USS, that the Trustees have to follow. TPR is required by law to reduce the risk of shortfalls in pension schemes having to be funded by the taxpayer. 

Also involved are the University and College Union (UCU), the trades union which represents many university employees, and Universities UK (UUK), the membership body which represents the university and other institutional employers whose staff are in the USS scheme.

At the national level, there is a disagreement about the plan to tackle the current projected gap (“the deficit”) between the projected value of the pension fund (“its assets”) and the amount it would need to pay pensions in the future (“its liabilities”).

On Friday 23 March UUK and UCU announced a new proposal agreed under the auspices of ACAS that would put benefit reform discussions on hold while a Joint Expert Panel examines the current valuation and agrees key principles to underpin a future joint approach. The existing scheme would be maintained as a result until April 2019. In April UCU members voted to accept the proposal

Alongside the national dispute, in March 2018 Imperial launched its own Pay and Benefits Review, which will inform future plans for staff pay and benefits in the years ahead. All staff were invited to take part in a consultation on the balance between investments in people and in facilities.

Access further information about the USS pension scheme