Imperial College London
Alternate

Professor the Lord Darzi of Denham PC KBE FRS FMedSci HonFREng

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer

Co-Director of the IGHI, Professor of Surgery
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 3312 1310a.darzi

 
 
//

Location

 

Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Wing (QEQM)St Mary's Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Khanbhai:2019:10.2196/jmir.9076,
author = {Khanbhai, MHF and Flott, KM and Darzi, A and Mayer, E},
doi = {10.2196/jmir.9076},
journal = {Journal of Medical Internet Research},
title = {Evaluating digital maturity and patient acceptability of real-time patient experience feedback systems: a systematic review},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9076},
volume = {21},
year = {2019}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - Background:One of the essential elements of a strategic approach to improving patients’ experience is to measure and report on patients’ experiences in real time. Real-time feedback (RTF) is increasingly being collected using digital technology; however, there are several factors that may influence the success of the digital system.Objective:The aim of this review was to evaluate the digital maturity and patient acceptability of real-time patient experience feedback systems.Methods:We systematically searched the following databases to identify papers that used digital systems to collect RTF: The Cochrane Library, Global Health, Health Management Information Consortium, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL. In addition, Google Scholar and gray literature were utilized. Studies were assessed on their digital maturity using a Digital Maturity Framework on the basis of the following 4 domains: capacity/resource, usage, interoperability, and impact. A total score of 4 indicated the highest level of digital maturity.Results:RTF was collected primarily using touchscreens, tablets, and Web-based platforms. Implementation of digital systems showed acceptable response rates and generally positive views from patients and staff. Patient demographics according to RTF responses varied. An overrepresentation existed in females with a white predominance and in patients aged ≥65 years. Of 13 eligible studies, none had digital systems that were deemed to be of the highest level of maturity. Three studies received a score of 3, 2, and 1, respectively. Four studies scored 0 points. While 7 studies demonstrated capacity/resource, 8 demonstrated impact. None of the studies demonstrated interoperability in their digital systems.Conclusions:Patients and staff alike are willing to engage in RTF delivered using digital technology, thereby disrupting previous paper-based feedback. However, a lack of emphasis on di
AU  - Khanbhai,MHF
AU  - Flott,KM
AU  - Darzi,A
AU  - Mayer,E
DO  - 10.2196/jmir.9076
PY  - 2019///
SN  - 1438-8871
TI  - Evaluating digital maturity and patient acceptability of real-time patient experience feedback systems: a systematic review
T2  - Journal of Medical Internet Research
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9076
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/65026
VL  - 21
ER  -
Download