Imperial College London
Alternate

Professor Toby Prevost

Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health

Visiting Professor
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

a.prevost

 
 
//

Location

 

57Stadium HouseWhite City Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Crocketta:2018:10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2,
author = {Crocketta, RA and King, SE and Marteau, TM and Prevost, AT and Bignardi, G and Roberts, NW and Stubbs, B and Hollands, GJ and Jebb, SA},
doi = {10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2},
journal = {Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews},
title = {Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2},
volume = {2},
year = {2018}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - BackgroundNutritional labelling is advocated as a means to promote healthier food purchasing and consumption, including lower energy intake. Internationally, many different nutritional labelling schemes have been introduced. There is no consensus on whether such labelling is effective in promoting healthier behaviour.ObjectivesTo assess the impact of nutritional labelling for food and non-alcoholic drinks on purchasing and consumption of healthier items. Our secondary objective was to explore possible effect moderators of nutritional labelling on purchasing and consumption.Search methodsWe searched 13 electronic databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase to 26 April 2017. We also handsearched references and citations and sought unpublished studies through websites and trials registries.Selection criteriaEligible studies: were randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials (RCTs/Q-RCTs), controlled before-and-after studies, or interrupted time series (ITS) studies; compared a labelled product (with information on nutrients or energy) with the same product without a nutritional label; assessed objectively measured purchasing or consumption of foods or non-alcoholic drinks in real-world or laboratory settings.Data collection and analysisTwo authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted study data. We applied the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool and GRADE to assess the quality of evidence. We pooled studies that evaluated similar interventions and outcomes using a random-effects meta-analysis, and we synthesised data from other studies in a narrative summary.Main resultsWe included 28 studies, comprising 17 RCTs, 5 Q-RCTs and 6 ITS studies. Most (21/28) took place in the USA, and 19 took place in university settings, 14 of which mainly involved university students or staff. Most (20/28) studies assessed the impact of labelling on menus or menu boards, or nutritional labelling placed on, or adjacent to, a range of foods or drinks from which partic
AU  - Crocketta,RA
AU  - King,SE
AU  - Marteau,TM
AU  - Prevost,AT
AU  - Bignardi,G
AU  - Roberts,NW
AU  - Stubbs,B
AU  - Hollands,GJ
AU  - Jebb,SA
DO  - 10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2
PY  - 2018///
SN  - 1469-493X
TI  - Nutritional labelling for healthier food or non-alcoholic drink purchasing and consumption
T2  - Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009315.pub2
UR  - http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000426476500006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/58994
VL  - 2
ER  -
Download