Publications
244 results found
Molnár Z, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Babai D, et al., 2024, Towards richer knowledge partnerships between ecology and ethnoecology., Trends Ecol Evol, Vol: 39, Pages: 109-115
Indigenous and traditional practices based on ethnoecological knowledge are fundamental to biodiversity stewardship and sustainable use. Knowledge partnerships between Indigenous Peoples, traditional local communities, and ecologists can produce richer and fairer understandings of nature. We identify key topical areas where such collaborations can positively transform science, policy, and practice.
Gonzalez A, Vihervaara P, Balvanera P, et al., 2023, Author Correction: A global biodiversity observing system to unite monitoring and guide action., Nat Ecol Evol, Vol: 7
Burton VJ, Baselga A, De Palma A, et al., 2023, Effects of land use and soil properties on taxon richness and abundance of soil assemblages, European Journal of Soil Science, Vol: 74, ISSN: 1351-0754
Land-use change and habitat degradation are among the biggest drivers of aboveground biodiversity worldwide but their effects on soil biodiversity are less well known, despite the importance of soil organisms in developing soil structure, nutrient cycling and water drainage. Combining a global compilation of biodiversity data from soil assemblages collated as part of the PREDICTS project with global data on soil characteristics, we modelled how taxon richness and total abundance of soil organisms have responded to land use. We also estimated the global Biodiversity Intactness Index (BII)—the average abundance and compositional similarity of taxa that remain in an area, compared to a minimally impacted baseline, for soil biodiversity. This is the first time the BII has been calculated for soil biodiversity. Relative to undisturbed vegetation, soil organism total abundance and taxon richness were reduced in all land uses except pasture. Soil properties mediated the response of soil biota, but not in a consistent way across land uses. The global soil BII in cropland is, on average, a third of that originally present. However, in grazed sites the decline is less severe. The BII of secondary vegetation depends on age, with sites with younger growth showing a lower BII than mature vegetation. We conclude that land-use change has reduced local soil biodiversity worldwide, and this further supports the proposition that soil biota should be considered explicitly when using global models to estimate the state of biodiversity.
Gonzalez A, Vihervaara P, Balvanera P, et al., 2023, A global biodiversity observing system to unite monitoring and guide action, NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, ISSN: 2397-334X
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 1
Cornford R, Spooner F, McRae L, et al., 2023, Ongoing over-exploitation and delayed responses to environmental change highlight the urgency for action to promote vertebrate recoveries by 2030, PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, Vol: 290, ISSN: 0962-8452
Liu D, Semenchuk P, Essl F, et al., 2023, The impact of land use on non-native species incidence and number in local assemblages worldwide, NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, Vol: 14
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 5
Valdez JWW, Callaghan CTT, Junker J, et al., 2023, The undetectability of global biodiversity trends using local species richness, ECOGRAPHY, Vol: 2023, ISSN: 0906-7590
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 5
Isbell F, Balvanera P, Mori AS, et al., 2023, Expert perspectives on global biodiversity loss and its drivers and impacts on people, FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, Vol: 21, Pages: 94-103, ISSN: 1540-9295
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 19
Burton VJ, Contu S, De Palma A, et al., 2022, Land use and soil characteristics affect soil organisms differently from above-ground assemblages, BMC Ecology and Evolution, Vol: 22, ISSN: 2730-7182
Background:Land-use is a major driver of changes in biodiversity worldwide, but studies have overwhelmingly focused on above-ground taxa: the effects on soil biodiversity are less well known, despite the importance of soil organisms in ecosystem functioning. We modelled data from a global biodiversity database to compare how the abundance of soil-dwelling and above-ground organisms responded to land use and soil properties.Results:We found that land use affects overall abundance differently in soil and above-ground assemblages. The abundance of soil organisms was markedly lower in cropland and plantation habitats than in primary vegetation and pasture. Soil properties influenced the abundance of soil biota in ways that differed among land uses, suggesting they shape both abundance and its response to land use.Conclusions:Our results caution against assuming models or indicators derived from above-ground data can apply to soil assemblages and highlight the potential value of incorporating soil properties into biodiversity models.
Jaureguiberry P, Titeux N, Wiemers M, et al., 2022, The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss, SCIENCE ADVANCES, Vol: 8, ISSN: 2375-2548
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 43
Sanchez AC, Jones SK, Purvis A, et al., 2022, Landscape complexity and functional groups moderate the effect of diversified farming on biodiversity: A global meta-analysis, AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, Vol: 332, ISSN: 0167-8809
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 8
Chaplin-Kramer R, Brauman KA, Cavender-Bares J, et al., 2022, Conservation needs to integrate knowledge across scales, NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, Vol: 6, Pages: 118-119, ISSN: 2397-334X
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 23
De Palma A, Hoskins A, Gonzalez RE, et al., 2021, Annual changes in the Biodiversity Intactness Index in tropical and subtropical forest biomes, 2001-2012, SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, Vol: 11, ISSN: 2045-2322
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 10
Tudge SJ, Purvis A, De Palma A, 2021, The impacts of biofuel crops on local biodiversity: a global synthesis, BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, Vol: 30, Pages: 2863-2883, ISSN: 0960-3115
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 14
Cornford R, Deinet S, De Palma A, et al., 2021, Fast, scalable, and automated identification of articles for biodiversity and macroecological datasets, GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, Vol: 30, Pages: 339-347, ISSN: 1466-822X
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 7
Tudge SJ, Purvis A, De Palma A, 2020, The impacts of biofuel crops on local biodiversity: a global synthesis
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Concerns about the environmental impacts of climate change have led to increased targets for biofuel in the global energy market. First-generation biofuel crops contain oil, sugar or starch and are usually also grown for food, whereas second-generation biofuel is derived from non-food sources, including lignocellulosic crops, fast-growing trees, crop residues and waste. Increasing biofuel production drives land-use change, a major cause of biodiversity loss, but there is limited knowledge of how different first- and second-generation biofuel crops affect local biodiversity. A more detailed understanding could support better decisions about the net environmental impacts of biofuels. We synthesised data from 116 sources where a potential biofuel crop was grown and estimated how two measures of local biodiversity, species richness and total abundance, responded to different crops. Local species richness and abundance were 37% and 49% lower at sites planted with first-generation biofuel crops than in sites with primary vegetation. Soybean, wheat, maize and oil palm had the worst effects; the worst affected regions were Asia and Central and South America; and plant species richness and vertebrate abundance were the worst affected biodiversity measures. Second-generation biofuels had significantly smaller effects: species richness and abundance were 19% and 25%, respectively, lower in such sites than in primary vegetation. Our models suggest that land clearance to generate biofuel results in negative impacts on local biodiversity. However, the geographic and taxonomic variation in effects, and the variation in yields among different crops, are all relevant for making the most sustainable land-use decisions.</jats:p>
Sanchez-Ortiz K, Taylor KJM, De Palma A, et al., 2020, Effects of land-use change and related pressures on alien and native subsets of island communities, PLOS ONE, Vol: 15, ISSN: 1932-6203
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 10
Bayley DT, Purvis A, Nellas AC, et al., 2020, Measuring the long-term success of small-scale marine protected areas in a Philippine reef fishery, CORAL REEFS, Vol: 39, Pages: 1591-1604, ISSN: 0722-4028
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 2
Purvis A, Jones KE, 2020, Georgina Mace (1953-2020) Pioneering conservation biologist and sustainability scientist, SCIENCE, Vol: 370, Pages: 915-915, ISSN: 0036-8075
Echeverria-Londono S, Sarkinen T, Fenton IS, et al., 2020, Dynamism and context-dependency in diversification of the megadiverse plant genus<i>Solanum</i>(Solanaceae), JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, Vol: 58, Pages: 767-782, ISSN: 1674-4918
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 21
Prudhomme R, De Palma A, Dumas P, et al., 2020, Combining mitigation strategies to increase co-benefits for biodiversity and food security, ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, Vol: 15, ISSN: 1748-9326
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 6
Waldock CA, De Palma A, Borges PA, et al., 2020, Insect occurrence in agricultural land-uses depends on realized niche and geographic range properties, ECOGRAPHY, Vol: 43, Pages: 1717-1728, ISSN: 0906-7590
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 6
Diaz S, Zafra-Calvo N, Purvis A, et al., 2020, Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability, SCIENCE, Vol: 370, Pages: 411-413, ISSN: 0036-8075
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 142
Turnhout E, Purvis A, 2020, Biodiversity and species extinction: categorisation, calculation, and communication, GRIFFITH LAW REVIEW, Vol: 29, Pages: 669-685, ISSN: 1038-3441
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 10
Mace GM, Barrett M, Burgess ND, et al., 2020, Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss (vol 52, pg 891, 2020), NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, Vol: 3, Pages: 885-885, ISSN: 2398-9629
Hoskins AJ, Harwood TD, Ware C, et al., 2020, BILBI: Supporting global biodiversity assessment through high-resolution macroecological modelling, ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, Vol: 132, ISSN: 1364-8152
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 16
Leclere D, Obersteiner M, Barrett M, et al., 2020, Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy, NATURE, Vol: 585, Pages: 551-+, ISSN: 0028-0836
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 297
Purvis A, 2020, A single apex target for biodiversity would be bad news for both nature and people, NATURE ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, Vol: 4, Pages: 768-769, ISSN: 2397-334X
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 17
Rosa IMD, Purvis A, Alkemade R, et al., 2020, Challenges in producing policy-relevant global scenarios of biodiversity and ecosystem services, GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, Vol: 22
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 25
Diaz S, Settele J, Brondizio E, et al., 2020, Investments' role in ecosystem degradation Response, SCIENCE, Vol: 368, Pages: 377-377, ISSN: 0036-8075
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 4
This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.