Imperial College London

ProfessorAlfriedVogler

Faculty of Natural SciencesDepartment of Life Sciences (Silwood Park)

Professor of Molecular Systematics
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7942 5613a.vogler

 
 
//

Location

 

Sir Alexander Fleming BuildingSouth Kensington Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Ahrens:2016:sysbio/syw002,
author = {Ahrens, D and Fujisawa, T and Krammer, H-J and Eberle, J and Fabrizi, S and Vogler, AP},
doi = {sysbio/syw002},
journal = {Systematic Biology},
pages = {478--494},
title = {Rarity and incomplete sampling in DNA-based species delimitation},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw002},
volume = {65},
year = {2016}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - DNA-based species delimitation may be compromised by limited sampling effort and species rarity, including “singleton” representatives of species, which hampers estimates of intra- versus interspecies evolutionary processes. In a case study of southern African chafers (beetles in the family Scarabaeidae), many species and subclades were poorly represented and 48.5% of species were singletons. Using cox1 sequences from >500 specimens and ∼100 species, the Generalized Mixed Yule Coalescent (GMYC) analysis as well as various other approaches for DNA-based species delimitation (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD), Poisson tree processes (PTP), Species Identifier, Statistical Parsimony), frequently produced poor results if analyzing a narrow target group only, but the performance improved when several subclades were combined. Hence, low sampling may be compensated for by “clade addition” of lineages outside of the focal group. Similar findings were obtained in reanalysis of published data sets of taxonomically poorly known species assemblages of insects from Madagascar. The low performance of undersampled trees is not due to high proportions of singletons per se, as shown in simulations (with 13%, 40% and 52% singletons). However, the GMYC method was highly sensitive to variable effective population size (NeNe), which was exacerbated by variable species abundances in the simulations. Hence, low sampling success and rarity of species affect the power of the GMYC method only if they reflect great differences in NeNe among species. Potential negative effects of skewed species abundances and prevalence of singletons are ultimately an issue about the variation in NeNe and the degree to which this is correlated with the census population size and sampling success. Clade addition beyond a limited study group can overcome poor sampling for the GMYC method in particular under variable NeNe. This effect was less pronounced for methods of species d
AU - Ahrens,D
AU - Fujisawa,T
AU - Krammer,H-J
AU - Eberle,J
AU - Fabrizi,S
AU - Vogler,AP
DO - sysbio/syw002
EP - 494
PY - 2016///
SN - 1076-836X
SP - 478
TI - Rarity and incomplete sampling in DNA-based species delimitation
T2 - Systematic Biology
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw002
UR - https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/article/65/3/478/2468954
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/50194
VL - 65
ER -