Imperial College London
Portrait Picture

Dr Benjamin Mullish

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction

IPPRF Research Fellow
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

b.mullish

 
 
//

Location

 

Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Wing (QEQM)St Mary's Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Cammarota:2019:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548,
author = {Cammarota, G and Ianiro, G and Kelly, CR and Mullish, BH and Allegretti, JR and Kassam, Z and Putignani, L and Fischer, M and Keller, JJ and Costello, SP and Sokol, H and Kump, P and Satokari, R and Kahn, SA and Kao, D and Arkkila, P and Kuijper, EJ and Vehreschild, MJGT and Pintus, C and Lopetuso, L and Masucci, L and Scaldaferri, F and Terveer, EM and Nieuwdorp, M and López-Sanromán, A and Kupcinskas, J and Hart, A and Tilg, H and Gasbarrini, A},
doi = {10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548},
journal = {Gut},
pages = {2111--2121},
title = {International consensus conference on stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548},
volume = {68},
year = {2019}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - <jats:p>Although faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has a well-established role in the treatment of recurrent <jats:italic>Clostridioides difficile</jats:italic> infection (CDI), its widespread dissemination is limited by several obstacles, including lack of dedicated centres, difficulties with donor recruitment and complexities related to regulation and safety monitoring. Given the considerable burden of CDI on global healthcare systems, FMT should be widely available to most centres.</jats:p><jats:p>Stool banks may guarantee reliable, timely and equitable access to FMT for patients and a traceable workflow that ensures safety and quality of procedures. In this consensus project, FMT experts from Europe, North America and Australia gathered and released statements on the following issues related to the stool banking: general principles, objectives and organisation of the stool bank; selection and screening of donors; collection, preparation and storage of faeces; services and clients; registries, monitoring of outcomes and ethical issues; and the evolving role of FMT in clinical practice,</jats:p><jats:p>Consensus on each statement was achieved through a Delphi process and then in a plenary face-to-face meeting. For each key issue, the best available evidence was assessed, with the aim of providing guidance for the development of stool banks in order to promote accessibility to FMT in clinical practice.</jats:p>
AU  - Cammarota,G
AU  - Ianiro,G
AU  - Kelly,CR
AU  - Mullish,BH
AU  - Allegretti,JR
AU  - Kassam,Z
AU  - Putignani,L
AU  - Fischer,M
AU  - Keller,JJ
AU  - Costello,SP
AU  - Sokol,H
AU  - Kump,P
AU  - Satokari,R
AU  - Kahn,SA
AU  - Kao,D
AU  - Arkkila,P
AU  - Kuijper,EJ
AU  - Vehreschild,MJGT
AU  - Pintus,C
AU  - Lopetuso,L
AU  - Masucci,L
AU  - Scaldaferri,F
AU  - Terveer,EM
AU  - Nieuwdorp,M
AU  - López-Sanromán,A
AU  - Kupcinskas,J
AU  - Hart,A
AU  - Tilg,H
AU  - Gasbarrini,A
DO  - 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548
EP  - 2121
PY  - 2019///
SN  - 0017-5749
SP  - 2111
TI  - International consensus conference on stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice
T2  - Gut
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/73666
VL  - 68
ER  -
Download