Imperial College London

Professor Julian J Bommer

Faculty of EngineeringDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Senior Research Investigator
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 5984j.bommer Website CV

 
 
//

Location

 

Skempton BuildingSouth Kensington Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Bommer:2018:10.1785/0220170247,
author = {Bommer, JJ and Dost, B and Edwards, B},
doi = {10.1785/0220170247},
journal = {Seismological Research Letters},
title = {The relationship between M and ML – a review and application to induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field, the Netherlands},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/0220170247},
year = {2018}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - The use of local magnitude (ML) in seismic hazard analyses is a topic of recent debate. In 2regions of weak-or moderate-seismicity, small earthquakes (characterized by ML) are 3commonly used to determine frequency-magnitude distributions (FMD) for probabilistic4seismic hazard calculations. However, empirical and theoretical studies on the relation 5between moment magnitude (M) and ML for small earthquakes show a systematic difference between the two below a region-dependent magnitude threshold. This difference may introduce bias in the estimation of the frequency of larger events with given M, and consequently seismic hazard. For induced seismicity related to the Groningen gas field, this magnitude threshold is determined to be M~ 2, with equality between Mand ML at higher magnitudes. A quadratic relation between M and ML is derived for 0.5 < ML < 2, in correspondence to recent theoretical studies. While the seismic hazard analysis for Groningen is internally consistent when expressed in terms of ML (with the implicit assumption of equivalence between the two scales), a more physical interpretation of theseismicity model requirestransformation of the earthquake catalogue from local to moment magnitude, especially since the dataset currently used in estimating time-dependent hazard consists mainly of ML< 2.5 events. We show that measured station effects, derived from Mcalculations, correspond to predicted model calculations used to determine a ground-motion model for the region.
AU - Bommer,JJ
AU - Dost,B
AU - Edwards,B
DO - 10.1785/0220170247
PY - 2018///
SN - 0895-0695
TI - The relationship between M and ML – a review and application to induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field, the Netherlands
T2 - Seismological Research Letters
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1785/0220170247
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/57781
ER -