Imperial College London

Dr Marco Aurisicchio

Faculty of EngineeringDyson School of Design Engineering

Reader in Engineering Design







Office 1 (104)Dyson BuildingSouth Kensington Campus






BibTex format

author = {Aurisicchio, M and Baroni, P and Pellegrini, D and Toni, F},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_1},
pages = {1--20},
title = {Comparing and integrating argumentation-based with matrix-based decision support in Arg&Dec},
url = {},
year = {2015}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

AB - © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015. The need of making decisions pervades every field of human activity. Several decision support methods and software tools are available in the literature, relying upon different modelling assumptions and often producing different results. In this paper we investigate the relationships between two such approaches: the recently introduced QuAD frameworks, based on the IBIS model and quantitative argumentation, and the decision matrix method, widely adopted in engineering. In addition, we describe Arg&Dec (standing for Argue & Decide), a prototype web application for collaborative decision-making, encompassing the two methodologies and assisting their comparison through automated transformation.
AU - Aurisicchio,M
AU - Baroni,P
AU - Pellegrini,D
AU - Toni,F
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_1
EP - 20
PY - 2015///
SN - 0302-9743
SP - 1
TI - Comparing and integrating argumentation-based with matrix-based decision support in Arg&Dec
UR -
ER -