Imperial College London
Alternate

ProfessorSalmanRawaf

Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health

Director of WHO Collaborating Centre
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 8814s.rawaf

 
 
//

Assistant

 

Ms Ela Augustyniak +44 (0)20 7594 8603

 
//

Location

 

311Reynolds BuildingCharing Cross Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{GBD:2018:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30994-2,
author = {GBD, 2016 Healthcare Access and Quality Collaborators},
doi = {10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30994-2},
journal = {Lancet},
pages = {2236--2271},
title = {Measuring performance on the Healthcare Access and Quality Index for 195 countries and territories and selected subnational locations: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30994-2},
volume = {391},
year = {2018}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - BACKGROUND: A key component of achieving universal health coverage is ensuring that all populations have access to quality health care. Examining where gains have occurred or progress has faltered across and within countries is crucial to guiding decisions and strategies for future improvement. We used the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2016 (GBD 2016) to assess personal health-care access and quality with the Healthcare Access and Quality (HAQ) Index for 195 countries and territories, as well as subnational locations in seven countries, from 1990 to 2016. METHODS: Drawing from established methods and updated estimates from GBD 2016, we used 32 causes from which death should not occur in the presence of effective care to approximate personal health-care access and quality by location and over time. To better isolate potential effects of personal health-care access and quality from underlying risk factor patterns, we risk-standardised cause-specific deaths due to non-cancers by location-year, replacing the local joint exposure of environmental and behavioural risks with the global level of exposure. Supported by the expansion of cancer registry data in GBD 2016, we used mortality-to-incidence ratios for cancers instead of risk-standardised death rates to provide a stronger signal of the effects of personal health care and access on cancer survival. We transformed each cause to a scale of 0-100, with 0 as the first percentile (worst) observed between 1990 and 2016, and 100 as the 99th percentile (best); we set these thresholds at the country level, and then applied them to subnational locations. We applied a principal components analysis to construct the HAQ Index using all scaled cause values, providing an overall score of 0-100 of personal health-care access and quality by location over time. We then compared HAQ Index levels and trends by quintiles on the Socio-demographic Index (SDI), a summary measure of overall development. As derive
AU  - GBD,2016 Healthcare Access and Quality Collaborators
DO  - 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30994-2
EP  - 2271
PY  - 2018///
SN  - 0140-6736
SP  - 2236
TI  - Measuring performance on the Healthcare Access and Quality Index for 195 countries and territories and selected subnational locations: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016
T2  - Lancet
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30994-2
UR  - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29893224
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/60124
VL  - 391
ER  -
Download