Publications

BibTex format

@article{Tatham:2020:10.1177/1751143719862244,
author = {Tatham, KC and McAuley, DF and Borthwick, M and Henderson, N and Bashevoy, G and Brett, SJ},
doi = {10.1177/1751143719862244},
journal = {Journal of the Intensive Care Society},
pages = {198--201},
title = {The National Institute for Health Research Critical Care Research Priority Setting Survey 2018},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1751143719862244},
volume = {21},
year = {2020}
}

Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - IntroductionDefining research priorities in intensive care is key todetermining appropriate allocation of funding. Several topics were  identified  from  the  recent  James  Lind  Alliance (JLA) priority  setting  exerciseconducted  with  the  Intensive  Care  Society(1).  The  JLA  process  included  significant  (and  vital) patient/public   contribution,   but   as   a   result may   have   failedto   identify   potential  early-stage translational  research  topics,  which  are  more  likely  identified by  medical/academic  members  of relevant specialist intensive care groups. Theobjectiveof the present project was to complement the JLA project by generating an updated list of research prioritiesby facilitatingacademic research input.MethodAsurveywas conducted  by  the National  Institute forHealth  Research(NIHR)to  identify  the  key research priorities from Intensive Care clinicians, including allied health professionals and academics, along with any evolving themes arising from translational research. Feasibility of all identified topics were then discussedand allocated to themesby ajoint clinical academics/NIHR focus group. ResultsThe  survey  was  completed  by  94 intensive  care  clinicians(including subspecialists),academicsand allied healthprofessions.  In total203researchquestionswere  identified,  with  the top  fivethemesfocusing  on:appropriate case  selection  (e.g.who  and  when  to  treat; 24%),  ventilation(7%),  sepsis (6%), delirium (5%) and rehabilitation (5%). DiscussionUtilising  a  methodology  distinct from  thatemployed  by  the  JLAprocess,  from  a  broad  spectrum  of intensive care clinicians/scientists,enabled identification of a variety of priority research areas. These topics cannowinform  not  only the investigator-led  researchagenda,  but  will alsobe considered in due course by the NIHR for potential future funding calls.
AU  - Tatham,KC
AU  - McAuley,DF
AU  - Borthwick,M
AU  - Henderson,N
AU  - Bashevoy,G
AU  - Brett,SJ
DO  - 10.1177/1751143719862244
EP  - 201
PY  - 2020///
SN  - 1751-1437
SP  - 198
TI  - The National Institute for Health Research Critical Care Research Priority Setting Survey 2018
T2  - Journal of the Intensive Care Society
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1751143719862244
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/71625
VL  - 21
ER  -

Download

ProfessorStephenBrett

Contact

Location

Summary

Citation

BibTex format

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)