Imperial College London
Portrait Picture

DrStuartHofer

Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health

Project Evaluation Manager
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)7894 473 482stuart.green

 
 
//

Location

 

Chelsea and Westminster HospitalChelsea and Westminster Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Poots:2014:intqhc/mzu005,
author = {Poots, AJ and Green, SA and Honeybourne, E and Green, J and Woodcock, T and Barnes, R and Bell, D},
doi = {intqhc/mzu005},
journal = {Int J Qual Health Care},
pages = {198--204},
title = {Improving mental health outcomes: achieving equity through quality improvement.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzu005},
volume = {26},
year = {2014}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - OBJECTIVE: To investigate equity of patient outcomes in a psychological therapy service, following increased access achieved by a quality improvement (QI) initiative. DESIGN: Retrospective service evaluation of health outcomes; data analysed by ANOVA, chi-squared and Statistical Process Control. SETTING: A psychological therapy service in Westminster, London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: People living in the Borough of Westminster, London, attending the service (from either healthcare professional or self-referral) between February 2009 and May 2012. INTERVENTION: s) Social marketing interventions were used to increase referrals, including the promotion of the service through local media and through existing social networks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: s) (i) Severity of depression on entry using Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9). (ii) Changes to severity of depression following treatment (ΔPHQ9). (iii) Changes in attainment of a meaningful improvement in condition assessed by a key performance indicator. RESULTS: Patients from areas of high deprivation entered the service with more severe depression (M = 15.47, SD = 6.75), compared with patients from areas of low (M = 13.20, SD = 6.75) and medium (M = 14.44, SD = 6.64) deprivation. Patients in low, medium and high deprivation areas attained similar changes in depression score (ΔPHQ9: M = -6.60, SD = 6.41). Similar proportions of patients achieved the key performance indicator across initiative phase and deprivation categories. CONCLUSIONS: QI methods improved access to mental health services; this paper finds no evidence for differences in clinical outcomes in patients, regardless of level of deprivation, interpreted as no evidence of inequity in the service with respect to this outcome.
AU  - Poots,AJ
AU  - Green,SA
AU  - Honeybourne,E
AU  - Green,J
AU  - Woodcock,T
AU  - Barnes,R
AU  - Bell,D
DO  - intqhc/mzu005
EP  - 204
PY  - 2014///
SP  - 198
TI  - Improving mental health outcomes: achieving equity through quality improvement.
T2  - Int J Qual Health Care
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzu005
UR  - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24521701
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/12831
VL  - 26
ER  -
Download