Imperial College London

DrSusanHodgson

Faculty of MedicineSchool of Public Health

Honorary Lecturer
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 2789susan.hodgson Website

 
 
//

Location

 

526Norfolk PlaceSt Mary's Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Nomura:2016:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.014,
author = {Nomura, S and Blangiardo, M and Tsubokura, M and Nishikawa, Y and Gilmour, S and Kami, M and Hodgson, S},
doi = {10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.014},
journal = {Preventive Medicine},
pages = {77--82},
title = {Post-nuclear disaster evacuation and survival amongst elderly people in Fukushima: a comparative analysis between evacuees and non-evacuees},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.014},
volume = {82},
year = {2016}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - BACKGROUND: Considering the health impacts of evacuation is fundamental to disaster planning especially for vulnerable elderly populations; however, evacuation-related mortality risks have not been well-investigated. We conducted an analysis to compare survival of evacuated and non-evacuated residents of elderly care facilities, following the Great East Japan Earthquake and subsequent Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant incident on 11th March 2011. OBJECTIVE: To assess associations between evacuation and mortality after the Fukushima nuclear incident; and to present discussion points on disaster planning, with reference to vulnerable elderly populations. METHODS: The study population comprised 1,215 residents admitted to seven elderly care facilities located 20-40km from the nuclear plant in the five years before the incident. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained from medical records. Evacuation histories were tracked until mid 2013. Main outcome measures are hazard ratios in evacuees versus non-evacuees using random-effects Cox proportional hazards models, and pre- and post-disaster survival probabilities and relative mortality incidence. RESULTS: Experiencing the disasters did not have a significant influence on mortality (hazard ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.43). Evacuation was associated with 1.82 times higher mortality (95% confidence interval: 1.22-2.70) after adjusting for confounders, with the initial evacuation from the original facility associated with 3.37 times higher mortality risk (95% confidence interval: 1.66-6.81) than non evacuation. CONCLUSIONS: The government should consider updating its requirements for emergency planning for elderly facilities and ensure that, in a disaster setting, these facilities have the capacity and support to shelter in place for at least sufficient time to adequately prepare initial evacuation.
AU - Nomura,S
AU - Blangiardo,M
AU - Tsubokura,M
AU - Nishikawa,Y
AU - Gilmour,S
AU - Kami,M
AU - Hodgson,S
DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.014
EP - 82
PY - 2016///
SN - 1096-0260
SP - 77
TI - Post-nuclear disaster evacuation and survival amongst elderly people in Fukushima: a comparative analysis between evacuees and non-evacuees
T2 - Preventive Medicine
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.014
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/29888
VL - 82
ER -