494 results found
Van Calster B, Bourne T, Froyman W, et al., 2021, Re: "Diagnostic Accuracies of the Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging ADNEX Scoring Systems for Ovarian Adnexal Mass: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis"., Acad Radiol
Kyriacou C, Cooper N, Robinson E, et al., 2021, Ultrasound characteristics, serum biochemistry and outcomes for ectopic pregnancies presenting during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: retrospective analysis, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, ISSN: 0960-7692
OBJECTIVES: To describe and then compare the characteristics of ectopic pregnancies (EP) in the year prior to and then during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2020 of women diagnosed with an EP (n=275) at a London dual center early pregnancy assessment service. Women were identified via the AstraiaTM ultrasound reporting system using coded and non-coded outcomes of 'EP' or 'pregnancy outside the uterine cavity'. Data relating to predefined outcomes were collected using AstraiaTM and CernerTM electronic reporting systems. Main outcome measures included clinical, ultrasound and biochemical features of EP, in addition to reported complications and management. Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism v8.2.1. RESULTS: Similar numbers and proportions of EP were seen in 2019 (n=141, 1%) and 2020 (n=134, 1%). Both cohorts were comparable in age, ethnicity, weight and method of conception. Gestational age at first ultrasound and at diagnosis was similar, with no difference in EP location, size or morphology. Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) levels at time of EP diagnosis were higher in 2020 than 2019 (1005 IU/L vs 665 IU/L, p=0.03). The type of final EP management was similar, but more failed first line management during the pandemic (16% vs 6%, p=0.01). Rates of blood visualized on ultrasound within the pelvis (hemoperitoneum) (23% vs 27%, p=0.58) and of rupture confirmed surgically (9% vs 3%, p=0.07) were both similar. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed in the location, size, morphology and gestational age of ectopic pregnancies. Complication rates and management were also unchanged. HCG levels were higher, and a greater proportion of conservative management measures failed during the pandemic. Our findings suggest women continued to access appropriate care for EP during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with no evidence of diagnostic delay or increase in adverse outcomes in our popul
Timmerman D, Cibula D, Planchamp F, et al., 2021, Response to: Correspondence on "ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors" by Thomassin-Nagarra et al., Int J Gynecol Cancer, Vol: 31, Pages: 1396-1397
Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, et al., 2021, Consensus on revised definitions of morphological uterus sonographic assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of a modified Delphi procedure., Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
OBJECTIVE: To update the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) definitions of adenomyosis if deemed necessary, and to reach consensus on the updated definitions METHODS: A modified Delphi procedure among European gynecologists with expertise in ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis was performed. To identify MUSA features that might need revision, 15 two-dimensional (2D) video recordings (four recordings including also three-dimensional (3D) still images) of transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) examinations of the uterus were presented in an online survey in the first Delphi round. Experts were asked to confirm or refute the presence of each of nine MUSA features of adenomyosis in each of the 15 videoclips and to give comments. In the second round, the results of the first round and suggestions for revision of MUSA features were shared with the experts before they were asked to assess a new set of 2D and 3D still images of TVUS examinations and to provide feedback on the proposed revisions. A third round, an on-line face-to-face meeting, was used to discuss and reach final consensus on revised definitions of MUSA features. Consensus was predefined as at least 66.7% agreement between experts. RESULTS: Sixteen of eighteen invited experts agreed to participate. Eleven experts completed and four experts partly finished the first assessment round. The experts identified a need for more detailed definitions of some MUSA features. They recommended to use 3D ultrasound to optimize visualization of the junctional zone. Fifteen experts joined the second round and reached consensus on the presence or absence of ultrasound features of adenomyosis in most still images. Consensus was reached for all revised definitions except those for subendometrial lines and buds and interrupted junctional zone. Thirteen experts joined the on-line meeting, discussed, and agreed on final revisions of the MUSA definitions. There was consensus on the need to distinguish between direct feature
Phylactou M, Abbara A, Al-Memar M, et al., 2021, Performance of plasma kisspeptin as a biomarker for miscarriage improves with gestation during the first trimester, Fertility and Sterility, Vol: 116, Pages: 809-819, ISSN: 0015-0282
ObjectiveTo compare the performance of kisspeptin and beta human chorionic gonadotropin (βhCG), both alone and in combination, as biomarkers for miscarriage throughout the first trimester.DesignProspective, nested case-control study.SettingTertiary Centre, Queen Charlotte Hospital, London, United Kingdom.Patient(s)Adult women who had miscarriages (n = 95, 173 samples) and women with healthy pregnancies (n = 265, 557 samples).Intervention(s)The participants underwent serial ultrasound scans and blood sampling for measurement of plasma kisspeptin and βhCG levels during the first trimester.Main Outcome Measure(s)The ability of plasma kisspeptin and βhCG levels to distinguish pregnancies complicated by miscarriage from healthy pregnancies unaffected by miscarriage.Result(s)Gestation-adjusted levels of circulating kisspeptin and βhCG were lower in samples from women with miscarriages than in women with healthy pregnancies by 79% and 70%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for identifying miscarriage during the first trimester was 0.874 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.844–0.904) for kisspeptin, 0.859 (95% CI 0.820–0.899) for βhCG, and 0.916 (95% CI 0.886–0.946) for the sum of the two markers. The performance of kisspeptin in identifying miscarriage improved with increasing length of gestation, whereas that of βhCG worsened. A decision matrix incorporating kisspeptin, βhCG, and gestational age had 83% to 87% accuracy for the prediction of miscarriage.Conclusion(s)Plasma kisspeptin is a promising biomarker for miscarriage and provides additional value to βhCG alone, especially during later gestational weeks of the first trimester.
Phylactou M, Abbara A, Al-Memar M, et al., 2021, Changes in circulating kisspeptin levels during each trimester in women with antenatal complications, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, ISSN: 0021-972X
ContextAntenatal complications such as hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), fetal growth restriction (FGR), gestational diabetes (GDM), and preterm birth (PTB) are associated with placental dysfunction. Kisspeptin has emerged as a putative marker of placental function, but limited data exist describing circulating kisspeptin levels across all three trimesters in women with antenatal complications.ObjectiveTo assess whether kisspeptin levels are altered in women with antenatal complications.DesignWomen with antenatal complications (n=105) and those with uncomplicated pregnancies (n=265) underwent serial ultrasound scans and blood-sampling at least once during each trimester (March 2014 to March 2017).SettingEarly Pregnancy Assessment Unit at Hammersmith Hospital, UK.ParticipantsWomen with antenatal complications: HDP (n=32), FGR (n=17), GDM (n=35) and PTB (n=11), and 10 women with multiple complications, provided 373 blood samples, and a further 265 controls provided 930 samples.Main outcomeDifferences in circulating kisspeptin levels.ResultsThird trimester kisspeptin levels were higher than controls in HDP but lower in FGR. The odds of HDP adjusted for gestational age, maternal age, ethnicity, BMI, smoking and parity were increased by 30% (95%CI 16-47%; p<0.0001), and of FGR were reduced by 28% (95%CI 4-46%; p=0.025), for every 1 nmol/L increase in plasma kisspeptin. Multiple of gestation-specific median values of kisspeptin were higher in pregnancies affected by PTB (p=0.014), and lower in those affected by GDM (p=0.020), but not significantly on multivariable analysis.ConclusionWe delineate changes in circulating kisspeptin levels at different trimesters and evaluate the potential of kisspeptin as a biomarker for antenatal complications.
Timmerman D, Planchamp F, Bourne T, et al., 2021, ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Vol: 31, Pages: 961-982, ISSN: 1048-891X
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group, and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors, including imaging techniques, biomarkers, and prediction models. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE nominated a multidisciplinary international group, including expert practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and management of patients with ovarian cancer (19 experts across Europe). A patient representative was also included in the group. To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on the review of the relevant literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement and a first round of voting was carried out. Statements were removed when a consensus among group members was not obtained. The voters had the opportunity to provide comments/suggestions with their votes. The statements were then revised accordingly. Another round of voting was carried out according to the same rules to allow the whole group to evaluate the revised version of the statements. The group achieved consensus on 18 statements. This Consensus Statement presents these ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE statements on the pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors and the assessment of carcinomatosis, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement.
Fourie H, Al-Memar M, Smith A, et al., 2021, The relationship between systemic oestradiol and vaginal microbiota composition in miscarriage and normal pregnancy, Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS, Pages: 311-312, ISSN: 0268-1161
Grewal K, Lee Y, Smith A, et al., 2021, Lactobacillus deplete vaginal microbial composition is associated with chromosomally normal miscarriage and local inflammation, Publisher: OXFORD UNIV PRESS, Pages: 56-56, ISSN: 0268-1161
Grewal K, Lee YS, Smith A, et al., 2021, Euploid Miscarriage Is Associated with Lactobacillus spp. Deplete Vaginal Microbial Composition and Local Inflammation., Publisher: SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, Pages: 77A-77A, ISSN: 1933-7191
Timmerman D, Planchamp F, Bourne T, et al., 2021, ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors, ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, Vol: 58, Pages: 148-168, ISSN: 0960-7692
Timmerman D, Planchamp F, Bourne T, et al., 2021, ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours., Facts Views Vis Obgyn, Vol: 13, ISSN: 2032-0418
The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG), the International Ovarian Tumour Analysis (IOTA) group and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) jointly developed clinically relevant and evidence-based statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours, including imaging techniques, biomarkers and prediction models. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE nominated a multidisciplinary international group, including expert practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours and management of patients with ovarian cancer (19 experts across Europe). A patient representative was also included in the group. To ensure that the statements were evidence-based, the current literature was reviewed and critically appraised. Preliminary statements were drafted based on the review of the relevant literature. During a conference call, the whole group discussed each preliminary statement and a first round of voting was carried out. Statements were removed when a consensus among group members was not obtained. The voters had the opportunity to provide comments/suggestions with their votes. The statements were then revised accordingly. Another round of voting was carried out according to the same rules to allow the whole group to evaluate the revised version of the statements. The group achieved consensus on 18 statements. This Consensus Statement presents these ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE statements on the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumours and the assessment of carcinomatosis, together with a summary of the evidence supporting each statement.
Kyriacou C, Bobdiwala S, Doulgeraki T, et al., 2021, Assessing progesterone cut-off levels in pregnancy of unknown location risk prediction, Publisher: WILEY, Pages: 38-38, ISSN: 1470-0328
Kyriacou C, Kapur S, Jeyapala S, et al., 2021, Point of care hCG performance and efficiency in pregnancy of unknown location, Publisher: WILEY, Pages: 37-37, ISSN: 1470-0328
Kyriacou C, Abbara A, Bobdiwala S, et al., 2021, Circulating kisspeptin levels in ectopic pregnancy and pregnancy of unknown location, Publisher: WILEY, Pages: 38-39, ISSN: 1470-0328
Coomarasamy A, Dhillon-Smith RK, Papadopoulou A, et al., 2021, Recurrent miscarriage: evidence to accelerate action, LANCET, Vol: 397, Pages: 1675-1682, ISSN: 0140-6736
Coomarasamy A, Gallos ID, Papadopoulou A, et al., 2021, Sporadic miscarriage: evidence to provide effective care, The Lancet, Vol: 397, Pages: 1668-1674, ISSN: 0140-6736
The physical and psychological effect of miscarriage is commonly underappreciated. The journey from diagnosis of miscarriage, through clinical management, to supportive aftercare can be challenging for women, their partners, and caregivers. Diagnostic challenges can lead to delayed or ineffective care and increased anxiety. Inaccurate diagnosis of a miscarriage can result in the unintended termination of a wanted pregnancy. Uncertainty about the therapeutic effects of interventions can lead to suboptimal care, with variations across facilities and countries. For this Series paper, we have developed recommendations for practice from a literature review, appraisal of guidelines, and expert group discussions. The recommendations are grouped into three categories: (1) diagnosis of miscarriage, (2) prevention of miscarriage in women with early pregnancy bleeding, and (3) management of miscarriage. We recommend that every country reports annual aggregate miscarriage data, similarly to the reporting of stillbirth. Early pregnancy services need to focus on providing an effective ultrasound service, as it is central to the diagnosis of miscarriage, and be able to provide expectant management of miscarriage, medical management with mifepristone and misoprostol, and surgical management with manual vacuum aspiration. Women with the dual risk factors of early pregnancy bleeding and a history of previous miscarriage can be recommended vaginal micronised progesterone to improve the prospects of livebirth. We urge health-care funders and providers to invest in early pregnancy care, with specific focus on training for clinical nurse specialists and doctors to provide comprehensive miscarriage care within the setting of dedicated early pregnancy units.
Quenby S, Gallos I, Dhillon-Smith R, et al., 2021, Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss, The Lancet, Vol: 397, Pages: 1658-1667, ISSN: 0140-6736
Miscarriage is generally defined as the loss of a pregnancy before viability. An estimated 23 million miscarriages occur every year worldwide, translating to 44 pregnancy losses each minute. The pooled risk of miscarriage is 15·3% (95% CI 12·5–18·7%) of all recognised pregnancies. The population prevalence of women who have had one miscarriage is 10·8% (10·3–11·4%), two miscarriages is 1·9% (1·8–2·1%), and three or more miscarriages is 0·7% (0·5–0·8%). Risk factors for miscarriage include very young or older female age (younger than 20 years and older than 35 years), older male age (older than 40 years), very low or very high body-mass index, Black ethnicity, previous miscarriages, smoking, alcohol, stress, working night shifts, air pollution, and exposure to pesticides. The consequences of miscarriage are both physical, such as bleeding or infection, and psychological. Psychological consequences include increases in the risk of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicide. Miscarriage, and especially recurrent miscarriage, is also a sentinel risk marker for obstetric complications, including preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, placental abruption, and stillbirth in future pregnancies, and a predictor of longer-term health problems, such as cardiovascular disease and venous thromboembolism. The costs of miscarriage affect individuals, health-care systems, and society. The short-term national economic cost of miscarriage is estimated to be £471 million per year in the UK. As recurrent miscarriage is a sentinel marker for various obstetric risks in future pregnancies, women should receive care in preconception and obstetric clinics specialising in patients at high risk. As psychological morbidity is common after pregnancy loss, effective screening instruments and treatment options for mental health consequences of miscarriage need
Mullins E, Hudak ML, Banerjee J, et al., 2021, Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of COVID-19: co-reporting of common outcomes from PAN-COVID and AAP SONPM registries, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol: 57, Pages: 5733-581, ISSN: 0960-7692
OBJECTIVE: Few large cohort studies have reported data on maternal, fetal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy. We report the outcome of infected pregnancies from a collaboration formed early during the pandemic between the investigators of two registries, the UK and global Pregnancy and Neonatal outcomes in COVID-19 (PAN-COVID) study and the US American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal Perinatal Medicine (AAP SONPM) National Perinatal COVID-19 Registry. METHODS: This was an analysis of data from the PAN-COVID registry (January 1st to July 25th 2020), which includes pregnancies with suspected or confirmed maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection at any stage in pregnancy, and the AAP SONPM National Perinatal COVID-19 registry (April 4th to August 8th 2020), which includes pregnancies with positive maternal testing for SARS-CoV-2 from 14 days before delivery to 3 days after delivery. The registries collected data on maternal, fetal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes. The PAN-COVID results are presented both overall for pregnancies with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and separately in those with confirmed infection. RESULTS: We report on 4005 pregnant women with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (1606 from PAN-COVID and 2399 from AAP SONPM). For obstetric outcomes, in PAN-COVID overall, those with confirmed infection in PAN-COVID and AAP SONPM, respectively, maternal death occurred in 0.5%, 0.5% and 0.2% of cases, early neonatal death in 0.2%, 0.3% and 0.3% of cases and stillbirth in 0.5%, 0.6% and 0.4% of cases. Delivery was pre-term (<37 weeks' gestation) in 12.0% of all women in PAN-COVID, in 16.2% of those women with confirmed infection in PAN-COVID and in 15.7% of women in AAP SONPM. Extremely preterm delivery (< 27 weeks' gestation) occurred in 0.5% of cases in PAN-COVID and 0.3% in AAP SONPM. Neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection was reported in 0.8% of all deliver
Al-karawi D, Al-Assam H, Du H, et al., 2021, An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Image-based Texture Features Extracted from Static B-mode Ultrasound Images in Distinguishing between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses, ULTRASONIC IMAGING, Vol: 43, Pages: 124-138, ISSN: 0161-7346
Dall'Asta A, Forlani F, Shah H, et al., 2021, Evaluation of the Tramline Sign in the Prediction of Placenta Accreta Spectrum and Perioperative Outcomes in Anterior Placenta Previa, ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, ISSN: 0172-4614
Christodoulou E, Bobdiwala S, Kyriacou C, et al., 2021, External validation of models to predict the outcome of pregnancies of unknown location: a multicentre cohort study., BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol: 128, Pages: 552-562, ISSN: 1470-0328
OBJECTIVE: To externally validate five approaches to predict ectopic pregnancy (EP) in pregnancies of unknown location (PUL): the M6P and M6NP risk models, the two-step triage strategy (2ST, which incorporates M6P), the M4 risk model, and beta human chorionic gonadotropin ratio cut-offs (BhCG-RC). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight UK early pregnancy assessment units. POPULATION: Women presenting with a PUL and BhCG >25 IU/L. METHODS: Women were managed using the 2ST protocol: PUL were classified as low risk of EP if presenting progesterone ≤2 nmol/L; the remaining cases returned two days later for triage based on M6P. EP risk ≥5% was used to classify PUL as high risk. Missing values were imputed, and predictions for the five approaches were calculated post hoc. We meta-analysed centre-specific results. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discrimination, calibration and clinical utility (decision curve analysis) for predicting EP. RESULTS: Of 2899 eligible women, the primary analysis excluded 297 (1 0%) women who were lost to follow-up. The area under the ROC curve for EP was 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.86-0.91) for M6P, 0.88 (0.86-0.90) for 2ST, 0.86 (0.83-0.88) for M6NP, and 0.82 (0.78-0.85) for M4. Sensitivities for EP were 96% (M6P), 94% (2ST), 92% (N6NP), 80% (M4), and 58% (BhCG-RC); false positive rates were 35%, 33%, 39%, 24%, and 13%. M6P and 2ST had the best clinical utility and good overall calibration, with modest variability between centres. CONCLUSIONS: 2ST and M6P performed best to predict and triage PUL.
Banerjee J, Mullins E, Townson J, et al., 2021, Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in COVID-19: Study protocol for a global registry of women with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy and their neonates, understanding natural history to guide treatment and prevention, BMJ Open, Vol: 11, Pages: 1-6, ISSN: 2044-6055
Introduction: Previous novel coronavirus pandemics, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), observed an association of infection in pregnancy with pre-term delivery, stillbirth and increased maternal mortality. Coronavirus disease2019(COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection, is the largest pandemic in living memory. Rapid accrual of robust case data on women in pregnancy and their babies affected by suspectedCOVID-19or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection will inform clinical management and preventative strategies in the current pandemic and future outbreaks. Methods and analysis: The Pregnancy And Neonatal outcomes in COVID-19 (PAN-COVID) registry is an observational study collecting focussed data on outcomes of pregnant mothers who have had suspected COVID-19 in pregnancy or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and their neonatesvia a web-portal. Amongst the women recruited to the PAN-COVID registry, the study will evaluate the incidence of:1. Miscarriage and pregnancy loss2. FGR and stillbirth 3. Pre-term delivery 4. Vertical transmission(suspected or confirmed) and early-onset neonatal SARS-CoV-2 infection Data will be centre based and collected on individual women and their babies. Verbal consent will be obtained, to reduce face-to-face contact in the pandemic whilst allowing identifiable data collection for linkage. Statistical analysis of the data will be carried out on a pseudonymised dataset by the study statistician. Regular reports will be distributed to collaborators on the study research questions. Ethics and dissemination: This study has received research ethics approval in the UK. For international centres, evidence of appropriate local approval will be required to participate, prior to entry of data to the database. The reports will be published regularly. The outputs of the study will be regularly disseminated to 4participants and collaborators on the study
Farren J, Jalmbrant M, Falconieri N, et al., 2021, Differences in post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression following miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy between women and their partners: a multicenter prospective cohort study, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol: 57, Pages: 141-148, ISSN: 0960-7692
OBJECTIVES: To investigate and compare post-traumatic stress, depression and anxiety in women and their partners over a 9-month period following miscarriage or ectopic pregnancy. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. Consecutive women and partners were approached in the early pregnancy units of three hospitals in central London. One, three and nine months after early pregnancy loss, recruits were emailed links to surveys containing the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Post-traumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS). The proportion of participants meeting screening criteria for moderate/severe anxiety or depression and post-traumatic stress (PTS) was assessed. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to analyse differences between women and their partners and the evolution over time. RESULTS: 386 partners were approached after the woman in whom the loss had been diagnosed consented to participate. 192 couples were recruited. All partners were male. Response rates were 57%, 45% and 38% for partners, and 76%, 68% and 57% for women, at month 1, 3 and 9 respectively. For partners, 7% met the criteria for PTS at month 1, 8% at month 3 and 4% at month 9, compared to 34%, 26% and 21%, respectively, of women. Partners also experienced lower rates of moderate/severe anxiety (6% vs 30% at month 1, 9% vs 25% at month 3, 6% vs 22% at month 9) and depression (2% vs 10% at month 1, 5% vs 8% at month 3, 1% vs 7% at month 9). The odds ratios for morbidity in partners vs women after 1 month was 0.02 (95% CI, 0.004-0.12) for post-traumatic stress, 0.05 (95% CI, 0.01-0.19) for moderate/severe anxiety and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.02-0.96) for moderate/severe depression. Morbidity for each outcome decreased modestly over time, without strong evidence of a different evolution for women and their partners. CONCLUSIONS: Partners experience far lower levels of post-traumatic stress, anxiety and depression than women after early pregnancy loss. This article is protected by copyright. A
Van den Bosch T, Verbakel JY, Valentin L, et al., 2021, Typical ultrasound features of various endometrial pathologies described using International Endometrial Tumor Analysis (IETA) terminology in women with abnormal uterine bleeding, ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, Vol: 57, Pages: 164-172, ISSN: 0960-7692
Moro F, Verdecchia V, Romeo P, et al., 2021, Ultrasound, macroscopic and histological features of malignant ovarian tumors, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, Vol: 31, Pages: 150-151, ISSN: 1048-891X
Moro F, Esposito R, Landolfo C, et al., 2021, Ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses and assessment of the extension of ovarian malignancy, BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, Vol: 94, ISSN: 0007-1285
Murugesu S, Galazis N, Jones B, et al., 2020, Evaluating the use of Telemedicine in Gynaecological Practice: A Systematic Review, BMJ Open, Vol: 10, ISSN: 2044-6055
Objectives The aim of this systematic review is to examine the use of telemedicine in the delivery and teaching of gynaecological clinical practice. To our knowledge, no other systematic review has assessed this broad topic.Design Systematic review of all studies investigating the use of telemedicine in the provision of gynaecological care and education. The search for eligible studies followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and focused on three online databases: PubMed, Science Direct and SciFinder.Eligibility criteria Only studies within gynaecology were considered for this review. Studies covering only obstetrics and with minimal information on gynaecology, or clinical medicine in general were excluded. All English language, peer-reviewed human studies were included. Relevant studies published up to the date of final submission of this review were considered with no restrictions to the publication year.Data extractions and synthesis Data extracted included author details, year of publication and country of the study, study aim, sample size, methodology, sample characteristics, outcome measures and a summary of findings. Data extraction and qualitative assessment were performed by the first author and crossed checked by the second author. Quality assessment for each study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.Results A literature search carried out in August 2020 yielded 313 records published between 1992 and 2018. Following a rigorous selection process, only 39 studies were included for this review published between 2000 and 2018. Of these, 19 assessed gynaecological clinical practice, eight assessed gynaecological education, one both, and 11 investigated the feasibility of telemedicine within gynaecological practice. 19 studies were classified as good, 12 fair and eight poor using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Telecolposcopy and abortion care were two areas where telemedicine was found to be effective in p
Bourne T, Bilardo CMK, 2020, ISUOG virtual world congress on ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology, 16-18 October 2020: presentations and awards, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol: 56, Pages: 958-960, ISSN: 0960-7692
Landolfo C, Achten ETL, Ceusters J, et al., 2020, Assessment of protein biomarkers for preoperative differential diagnosis between benign and malignant ovarian tumors, GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, Vol: 159, Pages: 811-819, ISSN: 0090-8258
This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.