Imperial College London

Dr Tini Garske

Faculty of MedicineSchool of Public Health

Senior Lecturer
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 3247t.garske

 
 
//

Location

 

G24Norfolk PlaceSt Mary's Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Cori:2017:10.1098/rstb.2016.0371,
author = {Cori, A and Donnelly, CA and dorigatti and ferguson, NM and fraser and garske and jombart and Nedjati-Gilani, G and Nouvellet and Riley and Van, Kerkhove and Mills and Blake, IM},
doi = {10.1098/rstb.2016.0371},
journal = {Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences},
title = {Key data for outbreak evaluation: building on the Ebola experience},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0371},
volume = {372},
year = {2017}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - Following the detection of an infectious disease outbreak, rapid epidemiological assessmentis critical to guidean effectivepublic health response. To understand the transmission dynamics and potential impact of an outbreak, several types of data are necessary. Here we build on experience gained inthe West AfricanEbolaepidemic and prior emerging infectious disease outbreaksto set out a checklist of data needed to: 1) quantify severity and transmissibility;2) characterise heterogeneities in transmission and their determinants;and 3) assess the effectiveness of different interventions.We differentiate data needs into individual-leveldata (e.g. a detailed list of reported cases), exposure data(e.g.identifying where / howcases may have been infected) and populationlevel data (e.g.size/demographicsof the population(s)affected andwhen/where interventions were implemented). A remarkable amount of individual-level and exposuredata was collected during the West African Ebola epidemic, which allowed the assessment of (1) and (2). However,gaps in population-level data (particularly around which interventions were applied whenand where)posed challenges to the assessment of (3).Herewehighlight recurrent data issues, give practical suggestions for addressingthese issues and discuss priorities for improvements in data collection in future outbreaks.
AU - Cori,A
AU - Donnelly,CA
AU - dorigatti
AU - ferguson,NM
AU - fraser
AU - garske
AU - jombart
AU - Nedjati-Gilani,G
AU - Nouvellet
AU - Riley
AU - Van,Kerkhove
AU - Mills
AU - Blake,IM
DO - 10.1098/rstb.2016.0371
PY - 2017///
SN - 1471-2970
TI - Key data for outbreak evaluation: building on the Ebola experience
T2 - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0371
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/44133
VL - 372
ER -