Imperial College London

DrWilliamMan

Faculty of MedicineNational Heart & Lung Institute

Reader in Respiratory Medicine
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)1895 828 851w.man

 
 
//

Location

 

Harefield HospitalHarefield Hospital

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Nolan:2019:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212765,
author = {Nolan, CM and Kaliaraju, D and Jones, SE and Patel, S and Barker, R and Walsh, JA and Wynne, S and Man, W},
doi = {10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212765},
journal = {Thorax},
pages = {996--998},
title = {Home versus outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a propensity-matched cohort study},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212765},
volume = {74},
year = {2019}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - Home-based exercise has been proposed as an equivalent treatment strategy to supervised outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), but it is not known whether its implementation into clinical practice produces similar benefits to those observed in trials. We compared the real-world responses of 154 patients with COPD undergoing home-based exercise with a matched group attending supervised PR. We observed smaller improvements in exercise capacity with home-based exercise compared with PR, but similar improvements in quality of life. We propose that supervised PR remains the standard of care, with home-based exercise a less effective alternative for those unable to attend PR.
AU - Nolan,CM
AU - Kaliaraju,D
AU - Jones,SE
AU - Patel,S
AU - Barker,R
AU - Walsh,JA
AU - Wynne,S
AU - Man,W
DO - 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212765
EP - 998
PY - 2019///
SN - 1468-3296
SP - 996
TI - Home versus outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a propensity-matched cohort study
T2 - Thorax
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212765
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31278173
UR - https://thorax.bmj.com/content/early/2019/07/05/thoraxjnl-2018-212765
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/71813
VL - 74
ER -