The view from the tower
by Don
My elder brother told me the other day that he still has nightmares about sitting his
A levels - some 30 years after the event.
This may say as much about his own scholastic abilities as it does about the exam
system. But with the A level season upon us and prospective Imperial students praying - or
revising - for the right grades I am more than ever conscious of the bizarreness of the
present system.
Leaving aside criticisms of the specialised exam system as such, the current UCAS
procedures seem increasingly untenable. Currently, 16- and 17-year olds have to make their
university choices on the basis of predicted A level grades. The ones I know usually have
a higher estimation of their intellectual abilities than may be justified. Good teachers
will give good advice, but no one takes kindly to being told they are really C quality and
not A. The student then sets their sight on a particular university, and receives an offer
requiring, say, two As and a B.
Those in favour of the predicted system will say that it is this which spurs the
student to achieve excellence. But I am not so sure, and things can go spectacularly
wrong. I have seen students drop grades often due to the quirkiness of the exam system as
much as to their own fault, lose their offers then rush around in August scrabbling for a
place at somewhere they did not want to go to and on a course they did not want to do.
Worse still, I know of a son of a colleague who set his heart on a well-known university
(not Imperial) but never even received an offer. He has now fallen into a slough of
despond, and has lost all motivation for his A level revision.
Isnt it about time we moved to a system where students did their A levels, got
their results, and then applied to universities? The distortions of predictions would
disappear, students would spend the final year concentrating on A levels rather than all
the distraction of UCAS application forms, and with the results at hand, there would be a
realistic expectation of the choices of university that were open.
Timing of course is the key. But my solution would be to start university academic
years in January, leaving plenty of time for A level marking and processing applications.
The long summer holidays and the tradition of an autumn start have little rational basis,
and are, I suspect, merely the dying embers of an agrarian economy and the demands for a
harvest workforce. Better to start refreshed at the start of the new year. University
finals students would then take their exams in the autumn with a long summer revision
period. And once finished how much better would be the Christmas celebrations that would
immediately follow?
The thought almost makes me want to resit my exams again - though I dont think it
will persuade my brother.
|