Citation

BibTex format

@article{Gheorghiade:2023:10.1007/s10816-023-09627-4,
author = {Gheorghiade, P and Vasiliauskaite, V and Diachenko, A and Price, H and Evans, T and Rivers, R},
doi = {10.1007/s10816-023-09627-4},
journal = {Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory},
pages = {1109--1141},
title = {Entropology: an information-theoretic approach to understanding archaeological data},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10816-023-09627-4},
volume = {30},
year = {2023}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - The main objective of this paper is to develop quantitative measures for describing the diversity, homogeneity, and similarity of archaeological data. It presents new approaches to characterize the relationship between archaeological assemblages by utilizing entropy and its related attributes, primarily diversity, and by drawing inspiration from ecology. Our starting premise is that diachronic changes in our data provide a distorted reflection of social processes and that spatial differences in data indicate cultural distancing. To investigate this premise, we adopt a parsimonious approach for comparing assemblage profiles employing and comparing a range of (Hill) diversities, which enable us to exploit different aspects of the data. The modelling is tested on two seemingly large datasets: a Late Bronze Age Cretan dataset with circa 13,700 entries (compiled by PG); and a 4th millennium Western Tripolye dataset with circa 25,000 entries (compiled by AD). The contrast between the strongly geographically and culturally heterogeneous Bronze Age Crete and the strongly homogeneous Western Tripolye culture in the Southern Bug and Dnieper interfluve show the successes and limitations of our approach. Despite the seemingly large size of our datasets, these data highlight limitations that confine their utility to non-semantic analysis. This requires us to consider different ways of treating and aggregating assemblages, either as censuses or samples, contingent upon the degree of representativeness of the data. While our premise, that changes in data reflect societal changes, is supported, it is not definitively confirmed. Consequently, this paper also exemplifies the limitations of large archaeological datasets for such analyses.
AU  - Gheorghiade,P
AU  - Vasiliauskaite,V
AU  - Diachenko,A
AU  - Price,H
AU  - Evans,T
AU  - Rivers,R
DO  - 10.1007/s10816-023-09627-4
EP  - 1141
PY  - 2023///
SN  - 1072-5369
SP  - 1109
TI  - Entropology: an information-theoretic approach to understanding archaeological data
T2  - Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10816-023-09627-4
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/108301
VL  - 30
ER  -
Download

Note to staff:  Adding new publications to a research group

  1. Log in to Symplectic.
  2. Click on Menu > Create Links
  3. Choose what you want to create links between – in this case ‘Publications’ and ‘Organisational structures’.
  4. Choose the organisational structure (research group) into which you want to link the publications and check the box next to it.
  5. Now check the box of any publication you want to add to that group. You can use the filters to find what you want and select multiple publications if necessary. 
  6. Scroll to the bottom and click the blue ‘Create new link’ button to link them.
  7. The publications will be added to the group, and will be displayed on the group publications feed within 24 hours (it is not immediate).

Any problems, talk to Tim Evans or the Faculty Web Team.