The MIM Lab develops robotic and mechatronics surgical systems for a variety of procedures.
Head of Group
Prof Ferdinando Rodriguez y Baena
B415C Bessemer Building
South Kensington Campus
+44 (0)20 7594 7046
⇒ X: @fmryb
What we do
The Mechatronics in Medicine Laboratory develops robotic and mechatronics surgical systems for a variety of procedures including neuro, cardiovascular, orthopaedic surgeries, and colonoscopies. Examples include bio-inspired catheters that can navigate along complex paths within the brain (such as EDEN2020), soft robots to explore endoluminal anatomies (such as the colon), and virtual reality solutions to support surgeons during knee replacement surgeries.
Why is it important
The integration of mechatronics into medicine addresses critical challenges in modern healthcare by enhancing the precision, safety, and efficiency of surgical procedures. Traditional surgeries often involve significant risks and extended recovery times. By developing robotic systems that offer greater accuracy and control, we aim to minimise these risks and reduce invasiveness. Our research contributes to the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, which are essential for improving patient outcomes and optimising healthcare resources. Furthermore, our work supports the training of the next generation of surgeons, equipping them with cutting-edge tools and methodologies that reflect the evolving landscape of medical technology.
How can it benefit patients
Patients stand to gain significantly from the innovations developed at the Mechatronics in Medicine Laboratory. Our robotic systems are designed to perform surgeries with enhanced precision, leading to fewer complications and faster recovery times. Minimally invasive procedures facilitated by our technologies result in less postoperative pain and reduced scarring, improving the overall patient experience. Additionally, the increased accuracy of our systems can lead to better surgical outcomes, such as more complete tumour removals or more precise joint replacements, thereby improving long-term health prospects. By pushing the boundaries of medical robotics, we strive to make advanced surgical care more accessible and effective for patients worldwide.
Meet the team
Results
- Showing results for:
- Reset all filters
Search results
-
Conference paperHenckel J, Richards R, Rodriguez y Baena F, et al., 2007,
Reporting accuracy in hip resurfacing: A 3D CT based method
, Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, 7th International Annual Meeting of CAOS, Pages: 664-666 -
Conference paperBarrett A, Davies B, Harris S, 2007,
Computer assisted hip resurfacing surgery using the Acrobot® navigation system
, Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, 7th International Annual Meeting of CAOS, Pages: 166-168 -
Conference paperNakhla A, Turner A, Rodriguez y Baena F, et al., 2007,
Navigated reduction and fixation of acetabular fractures
, Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, 7th International Annual Meeting of CAOS, Pages: 43-45 -
Conference paperHenckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin J, et al., 2007,
The Imperial hip protocol: An optimized very low dose ct protocol for planning and measuring outcome
, Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, 7th International Annual Meeting of CAOS, Pages: 475-477 -
Conference paperRodriguez y Baena F, Barrett A, Harris S, et al., 2007,
A bounded registration method for minimally invasive registration of the femur
, Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, 7th International Annual Meeting of CAOS, Pages: 125-127 -
Conference paperCobb J, Henckel J, Brust K, et al., 2007,
Accuracy provides enduring functional improvement in arthroplasty:18 months results of robotic assisted unicompartmental knee replacement
, Berlin, Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery, 7th International Annual Meeting of CAOS, Publisher: Pro Business, Pages: 183-185 -
Journal articleDavies BL, Rodriguez y Baena F, Barrett AR, et al., 2007,
Robotic control in knee joint replacement surgery
, Vol: 221, Pages: 71-80, ISSN: 0954-4119A brief history of robotic systems in knee arthroplasty is provided. The place of autonomous robots is then discussed and compared to more recent 'hands-on' robotic systems that can be more cost effective. The case is made for robotic systems to have a clear justification, with improved benefits compared to those from cheaper navigation systems. A number of more recent, smaller, robot systems for knee arthroplasty are also described. A specific example is given of an active constraint medical robot, the ACROBOT system, used in a prospective randomized controlled trial of unicondylar robotic knee arthroplasty in which the robot was compared to conventional surgery. The results of the trial are presented together with a discussion of the need for measures of accuracy to be introduced so that the efficacy of the robotic surgery can be immediately identified, rather than have to wait for a number of years before long-term clinical improvements can be demonstrated.
-
Journal articleHenckel J, Richards R, Lozhkin K, et al., 2006,
Very low-dose computed tomography for planning and outcome measurement in knee replacement - The imperial knee protocol
, J Bone Joint Surg Br, Vol: 88B, Pages: 1513-1518, ISSN: 0301-620XSurgeons need to be able to measure angles and distances in three dimensions in the planning and assessment of knee replacement. Computed tomography (CT) offers the accuracy needed but involves greater radiation exposure to patients than traditional long-leg standing radiographs, which give very little information outside the plane of the image. There is considerable variation in CT radiation doses between research centres, scanning protocols and individual scanners, and ethics committees are rightly demanding more consistency in this area. By refining the CT scanning protocol we have reduced the effective radiation dose received by the patient down to the equivalent of one long-leg standing radiograph. Because of this, it will be more acceptable to obtain the three-dimensional data set produced by CT scanning. Surgeons will be able to document the impact of implant position on outcome with greater precision.
-
Journal articleDavies BL, Jakopec M, Harris S, et al., 2006,
Active-constraint robotics for surgery
, PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, Vol: 94, Pages: 1696-1704, ISSN: 0018-9219 -
PatentRodriguez y Baena F, 2006,
Model-based positional estimation method
, WO2006048651
This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.
Contact Us
The Hamlyn Centre
Bessemer Building
South Kensington Campus
Imperial College
London, SW7 2AZ
Map location