Citation

BibTex format

@article{Ye:2022:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.164,
author = {Ye, M and Sharp, P and Brandon, N and Kucernak, A},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.164},
journal = {International Journal of Hydrogen Energy},
pages = {8565--8584},
title = {System-level comparison of ammonia, compressed and liquid hydrogen as fuels for polymer electrolyte fuel cell powered shipping},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.164},
volume = {47},
year = {2022}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - With the aim to reduce emissions from marine transport, electric propulsion systems for a water taxi and container ship powered by a hydrogen polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell system are designed and analyzed compared to the current fuel-oil engine systems in terms of system energy and exergy efficiency, fuel consumption, mass and volume, environmental impacts and cost. Hydrogen is stored either as a compressed gas (GH2), cryogenic liquid (LH2) or produced from liquid ammonia (LNH3) and can deliver 91%,91% and 88% greenhouse gas reductions, respectively. All hydrogen sources fit within ship volume and mass constraints apart from GH2 in the cargo ship. In the absence of carbon policy measures, the costs over a 25-year system life are 108% (GH2), 112% (LH2), 116% (LNH3) greater for the container ship and 43% (GH2), 105% (LNH3) greater for the water taxi. A carbon tax of £75-191/tonne CO2eq would allow the low carbon options to become cost competitive.
AU - Ye,M
AU - Sharp,P
AU - Brandon,N
AU - Kucernak,A
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.164
EP - 8584
PY - 2022///
SN - 0360-3199
SP - 8565
TI - System-level comparison of ammonia, compressed and liquid hydrogen as fuels for polymer electrolyte fuel cell powered shipping
T2 - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.164
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319921048643?via%3Dihub
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/94449
VL - 47
ER -