Results
- Showing results for:
- Reset all filters
Search results
-
Conference paperKogan F, Rosenberg J, McWalter EJ, et al., 2014,
Quantitative MRI of Osteoarthritis for Multicenter Trials: Standardization between Different Centers and Manufacturers
, ISMRM 22nd Annual Meeting -
Conference paperMendoza MA, Villalpando R, Park DJ, et al., 2014,
Water Fat Separation with Multiple-Acquisition bSSFP
, ISMRM 22nd Annual Meeting -
Conference paperTaylor M, Wang H, Badal J, et al., 2014,
Relaxometry and Contrast Optimization for Laryngeal Imaging at 3 Tesla
, ISMRM 22nd Annual Meeting -
Conference paperKaggie JD, Sapkota N, Jeong K, et al., 2014,
Synchronous 1 H and 23 Na dual-nuclear MRI on a clinical MRI system, equipped with a time-shared second transmit channel
, ISMRM 22nd Annual Meeting -
Conference paperPark DJ, Bangerter N, Morrell GR, 2014,
Decoupled RF-pulse phase sensitive B1 mapping
, ISMRM 22nd Annual Meeting -
Journal articleScott AD, Ferreira P, Nielles-Vallespin S, et al., 2014,
Improved in-vivo cardiac DTI using optimal b-values
, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol: 16, ISSN: 1097-6647- Cite
- Citations: 3
-
Journal articleAli A, Hsu LY, Gulati A, et al., 2014,
The association between ECV and microcirculation perfusion abnormalities in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy
, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol: 16, ISSN: 1097-6647- Cite
- Citations: 1
-
Journal articleGiannakidis A, Ferreira P, Scott AD, et al., 2014,
Scanner-efficient diffusion tensor imaging of human cardiac microstructure using the fast composite splitting reconstruction algorithm
, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol: 16, ISSN: 1097-6647- Cite
- Citations: 1
-
Journal articleTunnicliffe EM, Scott AD, Ferreira P, et al., 2014,
Inter-centre reproducibility of cardiac diffusion tensor measures
, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Vol: 16, ISSN: 1097-6647 -
Conference paperYang G, Raschke F, Barrick TR, et al., 2014,
Classification of brain tumour 1H MR spectra: Extracting features by metabolite quantification or nonlinear manifold learning?
, IEEE The International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Publisher: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Pages: 1039-1042© 2014 IEEE. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) provides non-invasive information on brain tumour biochemistry. Many studies have shown that 1H MRS can be used in an objective decision support system, which gives additional diagnosis and prognostic information to the data obtained using conventional radiological modalities. Fully automatic analyses of 1H MRS have been previously applied and can be separated into two types: (i) model dependent signal quantification followed by pattern recognition (PR), or (ii) model independent PR methods. However, there is not yet a consensus as to the best techniques of MRS post-processing or feature extraction to be used for optimum classification. In this study, we analysed the single-voxel MRS acquisitions of 74 patients with histologically diagnosed brain tumours. Our classification results show that the model independent nonlinear manifold learning method can produce superior results to those of using model dependent metabolite quantification.
This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.
Contact
For enquiries about the MRI Physics Collective, please contact:
Mary Finnegan
Senior MR Physicist at the Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Pete Lally
Assistant Professor in Magnetic Resonance (MR) Physics at Imperial College
Jan Sedlacik
MR Physicist at the Robert Steiner MR Unit, Hammersmith Hospital Campus