Search or filter publications

Filter by type:

Filter by publication type

Filter by year:

to

Results

  • Showing results for:
  • Reset all filters

Search results

  • Conference paper
    Park DJ, Javed A, Bangerter N, Khalighi MM, Morrell GRet al., 2011,

    Statistical Analysis of B1 Mapping Techniques

    , ISMRM 19th Annual Meeting
  • Conference paper
    Kaggie JD, Park DJ, Newbould R, Morrell GR, Hargreaves B, Staroswiecki E, Gold GE, Bangerter Net al., 2011,

    In Vivo Breast Sodium T1 Measurements Using Inversion Recovery 3D Cones

    , ISMRM 19th Annual Meeting
  • Journal article
    Jabbour A, Ettles C, Ismail T, Gulati A, Ferreira P, Wage R, Zaman S, Croisille P, Shakespeare C, Mohiaddin R, otherset al., 2011,

    Bolus administration T1 mapping as a marker of interstitial myocardial fibrosis in severe aortic stenosis

    , Circulation, Vol: 124, Pages: A17191-A17191
  • Journal article
    Asher K, Bangerter NK, Watkins RD, Gold GEet al., 2010,

    Radiofrequency Coils for Musculoskeletal MRI

    , Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ISSN: 0899-3459
  • Journal article
    Morrell MJ, Jackson ML, Twigg GL, Ghiassi R, McRobbie DW, Quest RA, Pardoe H, Pell GS, Abbott DF, Rochford PD, Jackson GD, Pierce RJ, O'Donoghue FJ, Corfield DRet al., 2010,

    Changes in brain morphology in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

    , THORAX, Vol: 65, Pages: 908-914, ISSN: 0040-6376
    • Cite
    • Citations: 138
  • Journal article
    Gold G, Shapiro L, Hargreaves B, Bangerter Net al., 2010,

    Advances in Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    , Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol: 21, Pages: 335-338, ISSN: 0899-3459
  • Conference paper
    Yang G, Hipwell J, Tanner C, Hawkes D, Arridge Set al., 2010,

    Collaboration of Reconstruction and Registration for Digital Tomosynthesis Application

    , 2010 Annual CIMST Meeting
  • Conference paper
    Yang G, Hipwell J, Clarkson M, Tanner C, Mertzanidou T, Gunn S, Ourselin S, Hawkes D, Arridge Set al., 2010,

    Combined Reconstruction and Registration of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis

    , 10th International Workshop on Digital Mammography (IWDM), Publisher: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Pages: 760-768, ISSN: 0302-9743
  • Journal article
    Staroswiecki E, Bangerter NK, Gurney PT, Grafendorfer T, Gold GE, Hargreaves BAet al., 2010,

    In vivo sodium imaging of human patellar cartilage with a 3D cones sequence at 3 T and 7 T

    , Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol: 32, Pages: 446-451, ISSN: 1053-1807

    <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose:</jats:title><jats:p>To compare signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs) and T*<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> maps at 3 T and 7 T using 3D cones from in vivo sodium images of the human knee.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and Methods:</jats:title><jats:p>Sodium concentration has been shown to correlate with glycosaminoglycan content of cartilage and is a possible biomarker of osteoarthritis. Using a 3D cones trajectory, 17 subjects were scanned at 3 T and 12 at 7 T using custom‐made sodium‐only and dual‐tuned sodium/proton surface coils, at a standard resolution (1.3 × 1.3 × 4.0 mm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>) and a high resolution (1.0 × 1.0 × 2.0 mm<jats:sup>3</jats:sup>). We measured the SNR of the images and the T*<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> of cartilage at both 3 T and 7 T.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p>The average normalized SNR values of standard‐resolution images were 27.1 and 11.3 at 7 T and 3 T. At high resolution, these average SNR values were 16.5 and 7.3. Image quality was sufficient to show spatial variations of sodium content. The average T*<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> of cartilage was measured as 13.2 ± 1.5 msec at 7 T and 15.5 ± 1.3 msec at 3 T.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p>We acquired sodium images of patellar cartilage at 3 T and 7 T in under 26 minutes using 3D cones with high resolution and acceptable SNR. The SNR improvement at 7 T over 3 T was within the expected range based on the increase in field strength. The measured T*<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> values were also consistent with previously published values. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:446–451. © 2010
  • Conference paper
    Yang G, Hipwell J, Clarkson M, Tanner C, Mertzanidou T, Gunn S, Ourselin S, Hawkes D, Arridge Set al., 2010,

    Combined reconstruction and registration of digital breast tomosynthesis: Sequential method versus iterative method

    , Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, Publisher: British Machine Vision Association, Pages: P27-1-P27-5

This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.

Request URL: http://www.imperial.ac.uk:80/respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-t4-html.jsp Request URI: /respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-t4-html.jsp Query String: id=1107&limit=10&resgrpMemberPubs=true&resgrpMemberPubs=true&page=69&respub-action=search.html Current Millis: 1768260699015 Current Time: Mon Jan 12 23:31:39 GMT 2026

Contact

For enquiries about the MRI Physics Collective, please contact:

Mary Finnegan
Senior MR Physicist at the Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

Pete Lally
Assistant Professor in Magnetic Resonance (MR) Physics at Imperial College

Jan Sedlacik
MR Physicist at the Robert Steiner MR Unit, Hammersmith Hospital Campus