Imperial College London

ProfessorAndrewAmis

Faculty of EngineeringDepartment of Mechanical Engineering

Professor
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 7062a.amis

 
 
//

Assistant

 

Ms Fabienne Laperche +44 (0)20 7594 7033

 
//

Location

 

713City and Guilds BuildingSouth Kensington Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Ismail:2008:10.3113/FAI.2008.0808,
author = {Ismail, M and Karim, A and Shulman, R and Amis, A and Calder, J},
doi = {10.3113/FAI.2008.0808},
journal = {Foot Ankle Int},
pages = {808--813},
title = {The Achillon achilles tendon repair: is it strong enough?},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2008.0808},
volume = {29},
year = {2008}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - BACKGROUND: Open repair of the Achilles tendon is associated with wound breakdown, infection and percutaneous methods risk sural nerve injury. The Achillon mini-incision technique can reduce these risks and may provide the opportunity for early active rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to compare the strength of the Achillon method with the commonly used Kessler method and to assess whether the strength of the repair was related to tendon diameter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Simulated ruptures in sheep Achilles tendons were repaired using either the Achillon method or a two-strand Kessler technique with a No. 2 Ticron suture (Tyco Healthcare, UK). Each tendon diameter was measured, and matched for both groups. Specimens were loaded to failure using an Instron tensile testing machine (Instron Limited, UK). RESULTS: Mean load to failure for the Achillon repair was 153 N+/-60 (range, 65 to 270), and the mean load to failure for the Kessler Repair was 123 N+/-24 (range, 75 to 150). This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.21). There was a statistically significant higher mean load to failure for wider tendons repaired by the Achillon method (p=0.05), however mean load to failure was not related to tendon width in Kessler repairs (p=0.23). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to compare these two methods of repair. The Achillon repair has comparable tensile strength to the Kessler Repair. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The Achillon repair appears to be a biomechanically sound method of repair for the acutely ruptured Achilles tendon.
AU - Ismail,M
AU - Karim,A
AU - Shulman,R
AU - Amis,A
AU - Calder,J
DO - 10.3113/FAI.2008.0808
EP - 813
PY - 2008///
SN - 1071-1007
SP - 808
TI - The Achillon achilles tendon repair: is it strong enough?
T2 - Foot Ankle Int
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2008.0808
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18752779
VL - 29
ER -