Imperial College London


Faculty of Natural SciencesCentre for Environmental Policy

Principal Research Fellow



+44 (0)20 7594 9332a.bauen




16 Prince's GardensSouth Kensington Campus






BibTex format

author = {Bhave, A and Taylor, RHS and Fennell, P and Livingston, WR and Shah, N and Mac, Dowell N and Dennis, J and Kraft, M and Pourkashanian, M and Insa, M and Jones, J and Burdett, N and Bauen, A and Beal, C and Smallbone, A and Akroyd, J},
doi = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.120},
journal = {APPLIED ENERGY},
pages = {481--489},
title = {Screening and techno-economic assessment of biomass-based power generation with CCS technologies to meet 2050 CO2 targets},
url = {},
volume = {190},
year = {2017}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

AB - Biomass-based power generation combined with CO2 capture and storage (Biopower CCS) currently represents one of the few practical and economic means of removing large quantities of CO2 from the atmosphere, and the only approach that involves the generation of electricity at the same time. We present the results of the Techno-Economic Study of Biomass to Power with CO2capture (TESBiC) project, that entailed desk-based review and analysis, process engineering, optimisation as well as primary data collection from some of the leading pilot demonstration plants. From the perspective of being able to deploy Biopower CCS by 2050, twenty-eight Biopower CCS technology combinations involving combustion or gasification of biomass (either dedicated or co-fired with coal) together with pre-, oxy- or post-combustion CO2 capture were identified and assessed. In addition to the capital and operating costs, techno-economic characteristics such as electrical efficiencies (LHV% basis), Levelised Cost of Electricity (LCOE), costs of CO2 captured and CO2 avoided were modelled over time assuming technology improvements from today to 2050. Many of the Biopower CCS technologies gave relatively similar techno-economic results when analysed at the same scale, with the plant scale (MWe) observed to be the principal driver of CAPEX (£/MWe) and the cofiring % (i.e. the weighted feedstock cost) a key driver of LCOE. The data collected during the TESBiC project also highlighted the lack of financial incentives for generation of electricity with negative CO2 emissions.
AU - Bhave,A
AU - Taylor,RHS
AU - Fennell,P
AU - Livingston,WR
AU - Shah,N
AU - Mac,Dowell N
AU - Dennis,J
AU - Kraft,M
AU - Pourkashanian,M
AU - Insa,M
AU - Jones,J
AU - Burdett,N
AU - Bauen,A
AU - Beal,C
AU - Smallbone,A
AU - Akroyd,J
DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.120
EP - 489
PY - 2017///
SN - 0306-2619
SP - 481
TI - Screening and techno-economic assessment of biomass-based power generation with CCS technologies to meet 2050 CO2 targets
UR -
UR -
UR -
VL - 190
ER -