Publications
593 results found
Dyson E, Helbig R, Avermaete T, et al., 2023, Impacts of the Ukraine-Russia Conflict on the Global Food Supply Chain and Building Future ResilienceDie Auswirkungen des Ukraine-Russland-Konflikts auf die globale Lebensmittelwarenkette und der Aufbau von kunftiger Resilienz, EUROCHOICES, ISSN: 1478-0917
Escher SE, Felter SP, Hollnagel H, et al., 2023, Workshop report on the evaluation of the updated and expanded carcinogen database to support derivation of threshold of toxicological concern values for DNA-reactive carcinogens., ALTEX, Vol: 40, Pages: 341-349
Hollnagel HM, Bellion P, Buist H, et al., 2022, Introduction to TTC - concept, databases, excluded substances and sources of uncertainty, 16th International Congress of Toxicology (ICT) - Uniting in Toxicology, Publisher: ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, Pages: S8-S8, ISSN: 0378-4274
Boobis A, 2022, Synthesis and integration of epidemiological and toxicological evidence, 16th International Congress of Toxicology (ICT) - Uniting in Toxicology, Publisher: ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, Pages: S47-S47, ISSN: 0378-4274
Doe JE, Boobis AR, Cohen SM, et al., 2022, A new approach to the classification of carcinogenicity, ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, Vol: 96, Pages: 2419-2428, ISSN: 0340-5761
Knowles ME, Anelich LE, Boobis AR, et al., 2022, Preface, Present Knowledge in Food Safety: A Risk-Based Approach through the Food Chain, Pages: xxxi-xxxi
Knowles ME, Anelich LE, Boobis AR, et al., 2022, Present Knowledge in Food Safety: A Risk-Based Approach Through the Food Chain, ISBN: 9780128231548
Present Knowledge in Food Safety: A Risk-Based Approach Through the Food Chain presents approaches for exposure-led risk assessment and the management of changes in the chemical, pathogenic microbiological and physical (radioactivity) contamination of ’food’ at all key stages of production, from farm to consumption. This single volume resource introduces scientific advances at all stages of the production to improve reliability, predictability and relevance of food safety assessments for the protection of public health. This book is aimed at a diverse audience, including graduate and post-graduate students in food science, toxicology, microbiology, medicine, public health, and related fields. The book's reach also includes government agencies, industrial scientists, and policymakers involved in food risk analysis.
Tan Y-M, Barton HA, Boobis A, et al., 2021, Opportunities and challenges related to saturation of toxicokinetic processes: Implications for risk assessment, REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, Vol: 127, ISSN: 0273-2300
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 7
Doe JE, Boobis AR, Cohen SM, et al., 2021, The codification of hazard and its impact on the hazard versus risk controversy, ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, Vol: 95, Pages: 3611-3621, ISSN: 0340-5761
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 3
Doerr B, Boobis A, 2021, The UK Committee on Toxicity (COT) and on Carcinogenicity (COC) of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment: Guidance for synthesising and integration of epidemiological and toxicological evidence, 56th Congress of the European-Societies-of-Toxicology (EUROTOX) - Toxicology of the Next Generation, Publisher: ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, Pages: S220-S220, ISSN: 0378-4274
Boobis AR, Pettit SD, 2021, Individualized toxicity is the future of risk assessment, 56th Congress of the European-Societies-of-Toxicology (EUROTOX) - Toxicology of the Next Generation, Publisher: ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, Pages: S11-S11, ISSN: 0378-4274
Boobis AR, 2021, Current challenges in a paradigm shift for cancer risk assessment, 56th Congress of the European-Societies-of-Toxicology (EUROTOX) - Toxicology of the Next Generation, Publisher: ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, Pages: S40-S40, ISSN: 0378-4274
Barile FA, Berry C, Blaauboer B, et al., 2021, The EU chemicals strategy for sustainability: in support of the BfR position, ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, Vol: 95, Pages: 3133-3136, ISSN: 0340-5761
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 4
Barile FA, Berry SC, Blaauboer B, et al., 2021, Critique of the "Comment" etitled "Pyrethroid exposure: not so harmless after all" by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology" (vol 340, pg 1, 2021), TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, Vol: 346, Pages: 57-57, ISSN: 0378-4274
Nyakutsikwa B, Britton J, Bogdanovica I, et al., 2021, Characterising vaping products in the United Kingdom: an analysis of Tobacco Products Directive notification data, ADDICTION, Vol: 116, Pages: 2521-2528, ISSN: 0965-2140
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 3
Firman JW, Punt A, Cronin MTD, et al., 2021, Exploring the Potential of ToxCast Data in Supporting Read-Across for Evaluation of Food Chemical Safety, CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, Vol: 34, Pages: 300-312, ISSN: 0893-228X
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 4
Barile FA, Berry SC, Blaauboer B, et al., 2021, Critique of the "Comment" etitled "Pyrethroid exposure: Not so harmless after all" by Demeneix et al. (2020) published in the lancet diabetes endocrinology, TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, Vol: 340, Pages: 1-3, ISSN: 0378-4274
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 1
Fenton SE, Ducatman A, Boobis A, et al., 2020, Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substance Toxicity and Human Health Review: Current State of Knowledge and Strategies for Informing Future Research, ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, Vol: 40, Pages: 606-630, ISSN: 0730-7268
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 242
Kumar V, Boobis AR, Moretto A, 2020, Test and Risk Assessment Strategies for combined exposure to multiple chemicals, FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, Vol: 144, ISSN: 0278-6915
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 6
Sewell F, Kimber I, Boobis AR, 2020, Use of the kinetically-derived maximum dose: Opportunities for delivering 3Rs benefits, REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, Vol: 116, ISSN: 0273-2300
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 6
Whaley P, Aiassa E, Beausoleil C, et al., 2020, Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER), ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, Vol: 143, ISSN: 0160-4120
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 39
Autrup H, Barile FA, Berry SC, et al., 2020, Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?, TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, Vol: 331, Pages: 259-264, ISSN: 0378-4274
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 12
Autrup H, Barile FA, Berry SC, et al., 2020, Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?, TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, Vol: 67, ISSN: 0887-2333
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 12
Autrup H, Barile FA, Berry SC, et al., 2020, Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?, ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, Vol: 78, ISSN: 1382-6689
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 12
Autrup H, Barile FA, Berry SC, et al., 2020, Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?, FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, Vol: 142, ISSN: 0278-6915
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 12
Autrup H, Barile FA, Berry SC, et al., 2020, Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?, CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, Vol: 326, ISSN: 0009-2797
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 1
Autrup H, Barile FA, Berry SC, et al., 2020, Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?, JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH-PART A-CURRENT ISSUES, Vol: 83, Pages: 485-494, ISSN: 1528-7394
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 12
Mahony C, Ashton RS, Birk B, et al., 2020, New ideas for non-animal approaches to predict repeated-dose systemic toxicity: Report from an EPAA Blue Sky Workshop, REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, Vol: 114, ISSN: 0273-2300
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 17
Autrup H, Barile FA, Berry SC, et al., 2020, Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity: how to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?, ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, Vol: 94, Pages: 2549-2557, ISSN: 0340-5761
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 5
Autrup H, Barile FA, Colin Berry S, et al., 2020, Human exposure to synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) is generally negligible as compared to natural compounds with higher or comparable endocrine activity. How to evaluate the risk of the S-EDCs?, Computational Toxicology, Vol: 14, ISSN: 2468-1113
Theoretically, both synthetic endocrine disrupting chemicals (S-EDCs) and natural (exogenous and endogenous) endocrine disrupting chemicals (N-EDCs) can interact with endocrine receptors and disturb hormonal balance. However, compared to endogenous hormones, S-EDCs are only weak partial agonists with receptor affinities several orders of magnitude lower than S-EDCs. Thus, to elicit observable effects, S-EDCs require considerably higher concentrations to attain sufficient receptor occupancy or to displace natural hormones and other endogenous ligands. Significant exposures to exogenous N-EDCs may result from ingestion of foods such as soy-based diets, green tea and sweet mustard. While their potencies are lower as compared to natural endogenous hormones, they usually are considerably more potent than S-EDCs. Effects of exogenous N-EDCs on the endocrine system were observed at high dietary intakes. A causal relation between their mechanism of action and these effects is established and biologically plausible. In contrast, the assumption that the much lower human exposures to S-EDCs may induce observable endocrine effects is not plausible. Hence, it is not surprising that epidemiological studies searching for an association between S-EDC exposure and health effects have failed. Regarding testing for potential endocrine effects, a scientifically justified screen should use in vitro tests to compare potencies of S-EDCs with those of reference N-EDCs. When the potency of the S-EDC is similar or smaller than that of the N-EDC, further testing in laboratory animals and regulatory consequences are not warranted.
This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.