Imperial College London

Angela Kedgley

Faculty of EngineeringDepartment of Bioengineering

Reader in Orthopaedic Biomechanics
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 0747a.kedgley Website

 
 
//

Location

 

514BSir Michael Uren HubWhite City Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Vissers:2021:10.1177/17531934211064201,
author = {Vissers, G and Rusli, WMR and Scarborough, A and Horwitz, MD and McArthur, GJ and Kedgley, AE},
doi = {10.1177/17531934211064201},
journal = {Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)},
title = {A study to compare strengths of cadaveric tendon repairs with round-bodied and cutting needles},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17531934211064201},
volume = {47},
year = {2021}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - This human cadaver study investigated whether flexor tendon repairs performed with round-bodied needleshad a higher risk of pull-out compared with those performed with cutting needles. Forty human cadavertendons were repaired (20 with each type of needle), subjected to tensile traction testing and evaluated byfailure load and mode of failure. The average failure load was 50 N (SD 13 N) for tendons repaired with roundbodied needles, compared with 49 N (SD 16 N) for tendons repaired with cutting needles. Round-bodiedneedles resulted in more suture pull-out (18 out of 20 tendons) than cutting needles (6 out of 20 tendons).We found no differences in failure load, but significant differences in the mode of failure between roundbodied and cutting needles when used for cadaveric flexor tendon repair.
AU - Vissers,G
AU - Rusli,WMR
AU - Scarborough,A
AU - Horwitz,MD
AU - McArthur,GJ
AU - Kedgley,AE
DO - 10.1177/17531934211064201
PY - 2021///
SN - 0266-7681
TI - A study to compare strengths of cadaveric tendon repairs with round-bodied and cutting needles
T2 - Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume)
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17531934211064201
UR - http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000729504500001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=1ba7043ffcc86c417c072aa74d649202
UR - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17531934211064201
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/93548
VL - 47
ER -