Publications

BibTex format

@article{Williams:2023:10.1016/j.chest.2022.06.048,
author = {Williams, PJ and Philip, KEJ and Gill, NK and Flannery, D and Buttery, S and Bartlett, EC and Devaraj, A and Kemp, SV and Addis, J and Derbyshire, J and Chen, M and Morris, K and Laverty, AA and Hopkinson, NS and Williams, PJ and Philip, KEJ and Gill, NK and Flannery, D and Buttery, S and Bartlett, EC and Devaraj, A and Kemp, SV and Addis, J and Derbyshire, J and Chen, M and Morris, K and Laverty, AA and Hopkinson, NS},
doi = {10.1016/j.chest.2022.06.048},
journal = {Chest},
pages = {455--463},
title = {Immediate, remote smoking cessation intervention in participants undergoing a targeted lung health check: quit smoking lung health intervention trial, a randomized controlled trial},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.06.048},
volume = {163},
year = {2023}
}

Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening programs provide an opportunity to support people who smoke to quit, but the most appropriate model for delivery remains to be determined. Immediate face-to-face smoking cessation support for people undergoing screening can increase quit rates, but it is not known whether remote delivery of immediate smoking cessation counselling and pharmacotherapy in this context also is effective. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does an immediate telephone smoking cessation intervention increase quit rates compared with usual care among a population enrolled in a targeted lung health check (TLHC)? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a single-masked randomized controlled trial, people 55 to 75 years of age who smoke and attended a TLHC were allocated by day of attendance to receive either immediate telephone smoking cessation intervention (TSI) support (starting immediately and lasting for 6 weeks) with appropriate pharmacotherapy or usual care (UC; very brief advice to quit and signposting to smoking cessation services). The primary outcome was self-reported 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence at 3 months. Differences between groups were assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Three hundred fifteen people taking part in the screening program who reported current smoking with a mean ± SD age of 63 ± 5.4 years, 48% of whom were women, were randomized to TSI (n = 152) or UC (n = 163). The two groups were well matched at baseline. Self-reported quit rates were higher in the intervention arm, 21.1% vs 8.9% (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.44-5.61; P = .002). Controlling for participant demographics, neither baseline smoking characteristics nor the discovery of abnormalities on low-dose CT imaging modified the effect of the intervention. INTERPRETATION: Immediate provision of an intensive telephone-based smoking cessation intervention, delivered within a targeted lung screening context, is associated with incr
AU  - Williams,PJ
AU  - Philip,KEJ
AU  - Gill,NK
AU  - Flannery,D
AU  - Buttery,S
AU  - Bartlett,EC
AU  - Devaraj,A
AU  - Kemp,SV
AU  - Addis,J
AU  - Derbyshire,J
AU  - Chen,M
AU  - Morris,K
AU  - Laverty,AA
AU  - Hopkinson,NS
AU  - Williams,PJ
AU  - Philip,KEJ
AU  - Gill,NK
AU  - Flannery,D
AU  - Buttery,S
AU  - Bartlett,EC
AU  - Devaraj,A
AU  - Kemp,SV
AU  - Addis,J
AU  - Derbyshire,J
AU  - Chen,M
AU  - Morris,K
AU  - Laverty,AA
AU  - Hopkinson,NS
DO  - 10.1016/j.chest.2022.06.048
EP  - 463
PY  - 2023///
SN  - 0012-3692
SP  - 455
TI  - Immediate, remote smoking cessation intervention in participants undergoing a targeted lung health check: quit smoking lung health intervention trial, a randomized controlled trial
T2  - Chest
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2022.06.048
UR  - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35932889
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012369222013204
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/100480
VL  - 163
ER  -

Download

Dr Anthony Laverty

Contact

Location

Summary

Citation

BibTex format

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)