Imperial College London
Portrait Picture

MrAlexLiddle

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer

Clinical Senior Lecturer in Orthopaedics
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

a.liddle Website

 
 
//

Assistant

 

Miss Colinette Hazel +44 (0)20 7594 2725

 
//

Location

 

203Sir Michael Uren HubWhite City Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Davies:2022:10.1177/24715492221095991,
author = {Davies, A and Selmi, H and Sabharwal, S and Vella-Baldacchino, M and Liddle, AD and Reilly, P},
doi = {10.1177/24715492221095991},
journal = {Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty},
pages = {1--8},
title = {Revision shoulder hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty a systematic review and meta-analysis.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24715492221095991},
volume = {6},
year = {2022}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - The number of shoulder replacements performed each year continues to increase, and the need for revision replacements has grown accordingly. The outcome of a revision replacement may influence which primary implant is selected and the timing of primary surgery, particularly in younger patients. The aim of this study was to establish the expected improvement in shoulder function and implant survival following revision of a hemiarthroplasty and revision of an anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed of all studies reporting shoulder scores or implant survival following revision hemiarthroplasty or revision TSA. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and National Joint Registry reports were searched. 15 studies were included, reporting on 593 revision anatomical shoulder replacements. There was large variation in the magnitude of improvement in shoulder scores following revision surgery. Over 80% of revision replacements last 5 years and over 70% last 10 years. There was no significant difference in shoulder scores or implant survival according to the type of primary implant. The belief that revision of a shoulder hemiarthroplasty may lead to improved outcomes compared to revision of a TSA is not supported by the current literature.
AU  - Davies,A
AU  - Selmi,H
AU  - Sabharwal,S
AU  - Vella-Baldacchino,M
AU  - Liddle,AD
AU  - Reilly,P
DO  - 10.1177/24715492221095991
EP  - 8
PY  - 2022///
SN  - 2471-5492
SP  - 1
TI  - Revision shoulder hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty a systematic review and meta-analysis.
T2  - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24715492221095991
UR  - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35692902
UR  - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/24715492221095991
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/101136
VL  - 6
ER  -
Download