Imperial College London
Alternate

Professor Andy Purvis

Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Life Sciences (Silwood Park)

Research Investigator
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7942 5686a.purvis Website

 
 
//

Location

 

Silwood ParkSilwood Park

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Tudge:2020:10.1101/2020.12.21.422503,
author = {Tudge, SJ and Purvis, A and De, Palma A},
doi = {10.1101/2020.12.21.422503},
title = {The impacts of biofuel crops on local biodiversity: a global synthesis},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.422503},
year = {2020}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Concerns about the environmental impacts of climate change have led to increased targets for biofuel in the global energy market. First-generation biofuel crops contain oil, sugar or starch and are usually also grown for food, whereas second-generation biofuel is derived from non-food sources, including lignocellulosic crops, fast-growing trees, crop residues and waste. Increasing biofuel production drives land-use change, a major cause of biodiversity loss, but there is limited knowledge of how different first- and second-generation biofuel crops affect local biodiversity. A more detailed understanding could support better decisions about the net environmental impacts of biofuels. We synthesised data from 116 sources where a potential biofuel crop was grown and estimated how two measures of local biodiversity, species richness and total abundance, responded to different crops. Local species richness and abundance were 37% and 49% lower at sites planted with first-generation biofuel crops than in sites with primary vegetation. Soybean, wheat, maize and oil palm had the worst effects; the worst affected regions were Asia and Central and South America; and plant species richness and vertebrate abundance were the worst affected biodiversity measures. Second-generation biofuels had significantly smaller effects: species richness and abundance were 19% and 25%, respectively, lower in such sites than in primary vegetation. Our models suggest that land clearance to generate biofuel results in negative impacts on local biodiversity. However, the geographic and taxonomic variation in effects, and the variation in yields among different crops, are all relevant for making the most sustainable land-use decisions.</jats:p>
AU  - Tudge,SJ
AU  - Purvis,A
AU  - De,Palma A
DO  - 10.1101/2020.12.21.422503
PY  - 2020///
TI  - The impacts of biofuel crops on local biodiversity: a global synthesis
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.21.422503
ER  -
Download