Imperial College London

Ben Creagh-Brown

Faculty of MedicineNational Heart & Lung Institute

Honorary Clinical Senior Lecturer
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

b.creagh-brown08

 
 
//

Location

 

Royal BromptonRoyal Brompton Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Papadopoulou:2022:10.3390/jcm11071770,
author = {Papadopoulou, A and Dickinson, M and Samuels, TL and Heiss, C and Hunt, J and Forni, L and Creagh-Brown, BC},
doi = {10.3390/jcm11071770},
journal = {J Clin Med},
title = {Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning in Intra-Abdominal Cancer Surgery (RIPCa): A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071770},
volume = {11},
year = {2022}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - There is limited evidence on the effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) following non-cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of RIPC on morbidity following intra-abdominal cancer surgery. We conducted a double blinded pilot randomised controlled trial that included 47 patients undergoing surgery for gynaecological, pancreatic and colorectal malignancies. The patients were randomized into an intervention (RIPC) or control group. RIPC was provided by intermittent inflations of an upper limb tourniquet. The primary outcome was feasibility of the study, and the main secondary outcome was postoperative morbidity including perioperative troponin change and the urinary biomarkers tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (TIMP-2IGFBP-7). The recruitment target was reached, and the protocol procedures were followed. The intervention group developed fewer surgical complications at 30 days (4.5% vs. 33%), 90 days (9.5% vs. 35%) and 6 months (11% vs. 41%) (adjusted p 0.033, 0.044 and 0.044, respectively). RIPC was a significant independent variable for lower overall postoperative morbidity survey (POMS) score, OR 0.79 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.99) and fewer complications at 6 months including pulmonary OR 0.2 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.92), surgical OR 0.12 (95% CI 0.007 to 0.89) and overall complications, OR 0.18 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.74). There was no difference in perioperative troponin change or TIMP2IGFBP-7. Our pilot study suggests that RIPC may improve outcomes following intra-abdominal cancer surgery and that a larger trial would be feasible.
AU - Papadopoulou,A
AU - Dickinson,M
AU - Samuels,TL
AU - Heiss,C
AU - Hunt,J
AU - Forni,L
AU - Creagh-Brown,BC
DO - 10.3390/jcm11071770
PY - 2022///
SN - 2077-0383
TI - Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning in Intra-Abdominal Cancer Surgery (RIPCa): A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial.
T2 - J Clin Med
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071770
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35407378
VL - 11
ER -