Imperial College London

Prof. Christina Fotopoulou

Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Surgery & Cancer

Chair in Gynaecological Cancer Surgery
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

c.fotopoulou

 
 
//

Location

 

Institute of Reproductive and Developmental BiologyHammersmith Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Publication Type
Year
to

414 results found

Schneider S, Campbell J, Fotopoulou C, 2022, Peri-operative ovarian cancer guidelines: anesthesia, intra- and post-operative volume and replacement, post-operative pain management, frailty scores/management of the fragile patient, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, Vol: 32, Pages: 1483-1485, ISSN: 1048-891X

Journal article

Fotopoulou C, Fagotti A, Campbell J, Aytulu Tet al., 2022, Peri-operative ovarian cancer guidelines: introduction, skin antisepsis, patient positioning, including retractors use and nutritional management, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, Vol: 32, Pages: 1338-1340, ISSN: 1048-891X

Journal article

Sehouli J, Schneider S, Fotopoulou C, 2022, Peri-operative ovarian cancer guidelines: prehabilitation, enhanced recovery, post-operative ileus prevention, post-operative physiotherapy and mobilization, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, Vol: 32, Pages: 1341-1343, ISSN: 1048-891X

Journal article

Lago V, Segarra-Vidal B, Cappucio S, Angeles MA, Fotopoulou C, Muallem MZ, Manzanedo I, Iglesias JLS, Chacon E, Padilla-Iserte P, Fagotti A, Ferron G, Kluge L, Vargiu V, Del M, Scambia G, Minig L, Tejerizo A, Segovia MG, Cascales-Campos PA, Hervas D, Domingo Set al., 2022, OVA-LEAK: Prognostic score for colo-rectal anastomotic leakage in patients undergoing ovarian cancer surgery, GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, Vol: 167, Pages: 22-27, ISSN: 0090-8258

Journal article

Nguyen-Strauli BD, Baum J, Meyer-Wilmes P, Kreklau A, Buschmann C, El Ouardi N, Fotopoulou C, Hummel M, Chekerov R, Braicu E, Sehouli J, Pietzner Ket al., 2022, Survey on implementation of molecular testing in ovarian cancer and PARP inhibitor: a national North-Eastern German Society of Gynecologic Oncology/Young Academy of Gynecologic Oncology/Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynakologische Onkologie intergroup analysis, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, Vol: 32, Pages: 1297-1302, ISSN: 1048-891X

Journal article

Cummins C, Kumar S, Long J, Balega J, Broadhead T, Duncan T, Edmondson RJ, Fotopoulou C, Glasspool RM, Kolomainen D, Leeson S, Manchanda R, Morrison J, Naik R, Tidy JA, Wood N, Sundar Set al., 2022, Investigating the Impact of Ultra-Radical Surgery on Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Using Population-Based Data in a Multicentre UK Study, CANCERS, Vol: 14

Journal article

Bisbas TG, Walch S, Naab T, Lahén N, Herrera-Camus R, Steinwandel UP, Fotopoulou CM, Hu CY, Johansson PHet al., 2022, The Origin of the [C ii] Deficit in a Simulated Dwarf Galaxy Merger-driven Starburst, Astrophysical Journal, Vol: 934, ISSN: 0004-637X

We present [C ii] synthetic observations of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulations of a dwarf galaxy merger. The merging process varies the star formation rate (SFR) by more than three orders of magnitude. Several star clusters are formed, the feedback of which disperses and unbinds the dense gas through expanding H ii regions and supernova (SN) explosions. For galaxies with properties similar to the modeled ones, we find that the [C ii] emission remains optically thin throughout the merging process. We identify the warm neutral medium ( 3 < log T gas < 4 with χ HI > 2χ H2) to be the primary source of [C ii] emission (∼58% contribution), although at stages when the H ii regions are young and dense (during star cluster formation or SNe in the form of ionized bubbles), they can contribute ≳50% to the total [C ii] emission. We find that the [C ii]/far-IR (FIR) ratio decreases owing to thermal saturation of the [C ii] emission caused by strong far-UV radiation fields emitted by the massive star clusters, leading to a [C ii] deficit medium. We investigate the [C ii]−SFR relation and find an approximately linear correlation that agrees well with observations, particularly those from the Dwarf Galaxy Survey. Our simulation reproduces the observed trends of [C ii]/FIR versus ΣSFR and ΣFIR, and it agrees well with the Kennicutt relation of SFR−FIR luminosity. We propose that local peaks of [C ii] in resolved observations may provide evidence for ongoing massive cluster formation.

Journal article

Montero-Macias R, Rigolet P, Mikhael E, Krell J, Villefranque V, Lecuru F, Fotopoulou Cet al., 2022, Traditional systemic treatment options in advanced low-grade serous ovarian cancer after successful cytoreduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Cancers, Vol: 14, Pages: 1-13, ISSN: 2072-6694

Objective: We performed a systematic literature review and a subsequent meta-analysis to compare traditional treatment options, i.e., antihormonal and cytotoxic, in LGSOC. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review in MEDBASE and MEDLINE between September 2000 and June 2021 for women who received cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or antihormonal treatment after primary cytoreduction due to stage II–IV LGSOC and also at relapse. PFS and OS were calculated depending on the type of their adjuvant treatment. For each endpoint in the meta-analysis, pooled HR was calculated using the random effect model with the inverse variance weighted method. Only primary patients were included in the subsequent meta-analysis due to the small number of studies in the relapsed setting. Results: Five eligible first-line studies were included. Systemic chemotherapy failed to provide a significant OS benefit when compared to no systemic treatment (pooled HR = 1.01, 95% CI [0.79, 1.29]) after successful cytoreduction. Moreover, systemic chemotherapy followed by antihormonal treatment also did not result to a significant PFS or OS benefit when compared to systemic chemotherapy alone (for PSF: pooled HR = 0.59, 95% CI [0.33, 1.04]; for OS: pooled HR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.50, 1.39]). There were insufficient data from studies in the recurrent setting to allow their inclusion in the meta-analysis. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, we failed to identify a traditional cytotoxic or antihormonal systemic treatment option that was associated with a significant OS or PFS benefit when administered following successful cytoreduction for advanced LGSOC. Prospective randomized studies are urgently warranted to define optimal adjuvant options in this challenging disease.

Journal article

Keunecke C, Kulbe H, Dreher F, Taube ET, Chekerov R, Horst D, Hummel M, Kessler T, Pietzner K, Kassuhn W, Heitz F, Muallem MZ, Lang SM, Vergote I, Dorigo O, Lammert H, du Bois A, Angelotti T, Fotopoulou C, Sehouli J, Braicu EIet al., 2022, Predictive biomarker for surgical outcome in patients with advanced primary high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Are we there yet? An analysis of the prospective biobank for ovarian cancer, GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, Vol: 166, Pages: 334-343, ISSN: 0090-8258

Journal article

Sehouli J, Fotopoulou C, Vergote I, Reuss A, Ferron G, Meier W, Greggi S, Mosgaard BJ, Selle F, Guyon F, Pomel C, Lecuru F, Zang R, Hellmann K, Kim J-W, Romeo M, Raspagliesi F, Eyjolfsdottir B, Du Bois A, Harter Pet al., 2022, Role of cytoreductive surgery for the second ovarian cancer relapse in patients previously treated with chemotherapy alone at first relapse: A subanalysis of the DESKTOP III trial., Annual Meeting of the American-Society-of-Clinical-Oncology (ASCO), Publisher: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, ISSN: 0732-183X

Conference paper

Ghisoni E, Benedetti F, Cunnea P, Fahr N, Gulhan DC, Minasyan A, Desbuisson M, Grimm A, Barras D, Dagher J, Fortis E, Rusakiewicz S, Tissot S, Mastroyannis SA, Swisher E, Kandalaft L, Tanyi J, Fotopoulou C, Coukos G, Dangaj Det al., 2022, Integrated digital pathology and single-cell analysis identify the spatial and temporal evolution of immune cells networks in epithelial ovarian cancer, ESMO Gynaecological Cancers Congress, Publisher: ELSEVIER, Pages: S395-S395, ISSN: 0923-7534

Conference paper

Wulandari R, Nixon K, Rama N, Curry E, Cunnea P, Fotopoulou Cet al., 2022, Characterisation of Proteomic heterogeneity following platinum therapy in High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer, Publisher: WILEY, Pages: 40-41, ISSN: 1470-0328

Conference paper

Sundar S, Cummins C, Kumar S, Long J, Arora V, Balega J, Broadhead T, Duncan T, Edmondson R, Fotopoulou C, Glasspool R, Kolomainen D, Leeson S, Manchanda R, McNally O, Morrison J, Mukhopadhyay A, Paul J, Tidy J, Wood Net al., 2022, Quality of life from cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: Investigating the association between disease burden and surgical complexity in the international, prospective, SOCQER-2 cohort study, BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, Vol: 129, Pages: 1122-1132, ISSN: 1470-0328

Journal article

Altmann J, Chekerov R, Fotopoulou C, Muallem M-Z, du Bois A, Cliby W, Dowdy S, Podratz K, Lichtenegger W, Camara O, Tunn R, Cibula D, Kuemmel S, Scambia G, Vergote I, Chiantera V, Pietzner K, Inci MG, Chopra S, Biebl M, Neymeyer J, Blohmer J-U, Sehouli Jet al., 2022, Ten years of live surgical broadcast at Charite-MAYO conferences (2010-2019): a systematic evaluation of the surgical outcome, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, Vol: 32, Pages: 746-752, ISSN: 1048-891X

Journal article

Baek M-H, Park EY, Ha HI, Park S-Y, Lim MC, Fotopoulou C, Bristow REet al., 2022, Secondary cytoreductive surgery in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol: 40, Pages: 1659-1670, ISSN: 0732-183X

PURPOSEThe survival impact of secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer was studied.METHODSWe identified published studies from 1983 to 2021 following our inclusion criteria from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. To integrate the effect size of single-arm studies, meta-analysis was performed using death rate as a primary outcome. The effect of complete cytoreduction and optimal cytoreduction on survival was evaluated using meta-regression. The pooled death rate was presented with a 95% CI. The publication bias was evaluated with the funnel plot and Egger's test, and sensitivity analysis was performed. To overcome missing death rates, the linear regression model was performed on log-transformed median overall survival (OS) time using study size as a weight.RESULTSThirty-six studies with 2,805 patients reporting death rates were used for this meta-analysis of the 80 eligible studies. There was strong heterogeneity, with the P value of the Cochrane Q test of < 0.0001 and Higgins's I2 statistics of 86%; thus, we considered a random effect model. The pooled death rate was 44.2% (95% CI, 39.0 to 49.5), and both the complete and optimal cytoreductions were associated with better survival outcomes as significant moderators in the meta-regression model (P < .001 and P = .005, respectively). Although 14 studies were located outside the funnel plot, Egger's test indicated no publication bias (P = .327). A sensitivity analysis excluding 14 studies showed similar results. In the linear regression model on the basis of 57 studies, the median OS time increased by 8.97% and 7.04% when the complete and optimal cytoreduction proportion increased by 10%, respectively, after adjusting other variables.CONCLUSIONSecondary cytoreductive surgery, resulting in maximal tumor resection, significantly prolongs OS in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Journal article

Fotopoulou C, 2022, Closing the gender gap in gynecological oncology publications: will men manage to keep up?, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, Vol: 32, Pages: 590-591, ISSN: 1048-891X

Journal article

Adamina M, Ademuyiwa A, Adisa A, Bhangu AA, Bravo AM, Cunha MF, Emile S, Ghosh D, Glasbey JC, Harris B, Keller D, Lawday S, Lederhuber H, Leventoglu S, Li E, Modolo MM, Mittal R, Mohan HM, Nepogodiev D, Parreno-Sacdalan MD, Pata F, Pockney P, Rutegard M, Simoes JFF, Smart N, Varghese C, Siaw-Acheampong K, Benson RA, Bywater E, Chaudhry D, Dawson BE, Evans JP, Gujjuri RR, Heritage E, Jones CS, Kamarajah SK, Khatri C, Khaw RA, Keatley JM, Knight A, Smart NJ, Minaya-Bravo A, Gallo G, Moug S, Di Saverio S, Vallance A, Vimalchandra D, Griffiths EA, Evans RPT, Townen P, Roberts K, McKay S, Isaac J, Satoi S, Edwards J, Coonar AS, Marchbank A, Caruana EJ, Layton GR, Patel A, Brunelli A, Ford S, Desai A, Gronchi A, Fiore M, Almond M, Tirotta F, Dumitra S, Kolias A, Price SJ, Fountain DM, Jenkinson MD, Hutchinson P, Marcus HJ, Piper RJ, Lippa L, Servadei F, Esene I, Freyschlag C, Neville I, Rosseau G, Schaller K, Demetriades AK, Robertson F, Alamri A, Shaw R, Schache AG, Winter SC, Ho M, Nankivell P, Biel JR, Batstone M, Ganly I, Vidya R, Wilkins A, Singh JK, Thekinkattil D, Sundar S, Fotopoulou C, Leung EY, Khan T, Chiva L, Sehouli J, Fagotti A, Cohen P, Gutelkin M, Ghebre R, Konney T, Pareja R, Bristow R, Dowdy S, Shylasree TS, Seenivasagam RK, Ng J, Fujiwar K, Stewart GD, Lamb B, Narahari K, McNeill A, Colquhoun A, McGrath JS, Bromage S, Barod R, Kasivisvanathan V, Klatte T, Abbott TEF, Abukhalaf S, Ademuyiwa AO, Agarwal A, Akkulak M, Alameer E, Alderson D, Alakaloko F, Albertsmeier M, Alser O, Alshaar M, Alshryda S, Arnaud AP, Augestad KM, Ayasra F, Azevedo J, Bankhead-Kendall BK, Barlow E, Beard D, Blanco-Colino R, Brar A, Breen KA, Bretherton C, Buarque IL, Burke J, Chaar M, Chakrabortee S, Christensen P, Cox D, Cukier M, Davidson GH, Drake TM, Edwards JG, Elhadi M, Farik S, Fitzgerald JE, Garmanova T, Gomes GMA, Grecinos G, Gruendl M, Halkias C, Harrison EM, Hisham I, Hutchinson PJ, Hwang S, Isik A, Jonker P, Kaafarani HMA, Kruijff S, Lawani I, Litvin A, Loehrer A, Lofet al., 2022, The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study, Colorectal Disease, Vol: 24, Pages: 708-726, ISSN: 1462-8910

AimThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery.MethodsThis was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January–April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin.ResultsOverall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). After adjustment, delay was not associated with a lower rate of complete resection (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.90–1.55, P = 0.224), which was consistent in elective patients only (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69–1.27, P = 0.672). Longer delays were not associated with poorer outcomes.ConclusionOne in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease.

Journal article

Angeles MA, Bizzarri N, Shushkevich A, Gomez-Hidalgo NR, Theofanakis C, Strojna A, Kacperczyk-Bartnik J, Bilir E, Razumova Z, du Bois A, Cibula D, Concin N, Fotopoulou C, Rodolakis A, Harter P, Ramirez PTet al., 2022, Interviews from the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology 2021 Congress: an IJGC-ENYGO Fellows compilation, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, Vol: 32, Pages: 468-473, ISSN: 1048-891X

Journal article

Clark J, Fotopoulou C, Cunnea P, Krell Jet al., 2022, Novel ex vivo models of epithelial ovarian cancer: the future of biomarker and therapeutic research, Frontiers in Oncology, Vol: 12, Pages: 1-17, ISSN: 2234-943X

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a heterogenous disease associated with variations in presentation, pathology and prognosis. Advanced EOC is typified by frequent relapse and a historical 5-year survival of less than 30% despite improvements in surgical and systemic treatment. The advent of next generation sequencing has led to notable advances in the field of personalised medicine for many cancer types. Success in achieving cure in advanced EOC has however been limited, although significant prolongation of survival has been demonstrated. Development of novel research platforms is therefore necessary to address the rapidly advancing field of early diagnostics and therapeutics, whilst also acknowledging the significant tumour heterogeneity associated with EOC. Within available tumour models, patient-derived organoids (PDO) and explant tumour slices have demonstrated particular promise as novel ex vivo systems to model different cancer types including ovarian cancer. PDOs are organ specific 3D tumour cultures that can accurately represent the histology and genomics of their native tumour, as well as offer the possibility as models for pharmaceutical drug testing platforms, offering timing advantages and potential use as prospective personalised models to guide clinical decision-making. Such applications could maximise the benefit of drug treatments to patients on an individual level whilst minimising use of less effective, yet toxic, therapies. PDOs are likely to play a greater role in both academic research and drug development in the future and have the potential to revolutionise future patient treatment and clinical trial pathways. Similarly, ex vivo tumour slices or explants have also shown recent renewed promise in their ability to provide a fast, specific, platform for drug testing that accurately represents in vivo tumour response. Tumour explants retain tissue architecture, and thus incorporate the majority of tumour microenvironment making them an attractive

Journal article

Morrison J, Balega J, Buckley L, Clamp A, Crosbie E, Drew Y, Durrant L, Forrest J, Fotopoulou C, Gajjar K, Ganesan R, Gupta J, Hughes J, Miles T, Moss E, Nanthakumar M, Newton C, Ryan N, Walther A, Taylor Aet al., 2022, British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) uterine cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, Vol: 270, Pages: 50-89, ISSN: 0301-2115

Journal article

Prodromidou A, Phelps DL, Pergialiotis V, Cunnea P, Thomakos N, Rodolakis A, Fotopoulou C, Haidopoulos Det al., 2022, Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A systematic review and meta-analysis, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, Vol: 270, Pages: 212-220, ISSN: 0301-2115

Journal article

Taylor A, Sundar SS, Bowen R, Clayton R, Coleridge S, Fotopoulou C, Ghaem-Maghami S, Ledermann J, Manchanda R, Maxwell H, Michael A, Miles T, Nicum S, Nordin A, Ramsay B, Rundle S, Williams S, Wood NJ, Yiannakis D, Morrison Jet al., 2022, British Gynaecological Cancer Society Recommendations for Women With Gynecological Cancer Who Received Non-standard Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic, OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, Vol: 77, Pages: 156-157, ISSN: 0029-7828

Journal article

Tabiri S, Kamarajah SK, Nepogodiev D, Li E, Simoes J, Sravanam S, Owusu SA, Mahama H, Agyeman YN, Arthur J, Kunfah SM, Gyamfi FE, Owusu EA, Loffler MW, Wandoh P, Bhangu A, Siaw-Acheampong K, Argus L, Chaudhry D, Dawson BE, Glasbey JC, Gujjuri RR, Jones CS, Khatri C, Keatley JM, Lawday S, Mann H, Marson EJ, Mclean KA, Picciochi M, Taylor EH, Tiwari A, Simoes JFF, Trout IM, Venn ML, Wilkin RJW, Dajti I, Gjata A, Boccalatte L, Modolo MM, Cox D, Pockney P, Townend P, Aigner F, Kronberger I, Hossain K, VanRamshorst G, Lawani I, Ataide G, Baiocchi G, Buarque I, Gohar M, Slavchev M, Agarwal A, Brar A, Martin J, Olivos M, Calvache J, Perez Rivera CJ, Hadzibegovic AD, Kopjar T, Mihanovic J, Klat J, Novysedlak R, Christensen P, El-Hussuna A, Batista S, Lincango E, Emile SH, Mengesha MG, Hailu DS, Tamiru H, Kauppila J, Arnaud A, Albertsmeiers M, Lederhuber H, Loffler M, Metallidis S, Tsoulfas G, Lorena MA, Grecinos G, Mersich T, Wettstein D, Ghosh D, Kembuan G, Brouk P, Khosravi M, Mozafari M, Adil A, Mohan HM, Zmora O, Fiore M, Gallo G, Pata F, Pellino G, Satoi S, Ayasra F, Chaar M, Fakhradiyev IR, Jamal M, Elhadi M, Gulla A, Roslani A, Martinez L, Ramos De la Medina A, Outani O, Jonker P, Kruijff S, Noltes M, Steinkamp P, van der Plas W, Ademuyiwa A, Osinaike B, Seyi-olajide J, Williams E, Pejkova S, Augestad KM, Soreide K, Al Balushi Z, Qureshi A, Sayyed R, Daraghmeh MAM, Abukhalaf S, Cukier M, Gomez H, Shu S, Vasquez X, Parreno-Sacdalan MD, Major P, Azevedo J, Cunha M, Santos I, Zarour A, Bonci E-A, Negoi I, Efetov S, Litvin A, Ntirenganya F, AlAmeer E, Radenkovic D, Xiang FKH, Hoe CM, Yong JNC, Moore R, Nhlabathi N, Colino RB, Bravo AM, Minaya-Bravo A, Jayarajah U, Wickramasinghe D, Elmujtaba M, Jebril W, Rutegard M, Sund M, Isik A, Leventoglu S, Abbott TEF, Benson R, Caruna E, Chakrabortee S, Demetriades A, Desai A, Drake TD, Edwards JG, Evans JP, Ford S, Fotopoulou C, Griffiths E, Hutchinson P, Jenkinson MD, Khan T, Knight S, Kolias A, Leung E, McKay S, Norman L, Ots Ret al., 2022, Impact of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination on postoperative mortality in patients with perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infection, BJS Open, Vol: 5, ISSN: 2474-9842

Journal article

Salvo G, Ramirez PT, Leitao MM, Cibula D, Wu X, Falconer H, Persson J, Perrotta M, Mosgaard BJ, Kucukmetin A, Berlev I, Rendon G, Liu K, Vieira M, Capilna ME, Fotopoulou C, Baiocchi G, Kaidarova D, Ribeiro R, Pedra-Nobre S, Kocian R, Li X, Li J, Palsdottir K, Noll F, Rundle S, Ulrikh E, Hu Z, Gheorghe M, Saso S, Bolatbekova R, Tsunoda A, Pitcher B, Wu J, Urbauer D, Pareja Ret al., 2022, Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, Vol: 226, ISSN: 0002-9378

Journal article

COVIDSurg Collaborative, GlobalSurg Collaborative, 2022, SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and venous thromboembolism after surgery: an international prospective cohort study, Anaesthesia, Vol: 77, Pages: 28-39, ISSN: 0003-2409

SARS-CoV-2 has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients. Since surgical patients are already at higher risk of venous thromboembolism than general populations, this study aimed to determine if patients with peri-operative or prior SARS-CoV-2 were at further increased risk of venous thromboembolism. We conducted a planned sub-study and analysis from an international, multicentre, prospective cohort study of elective and emergency patients undergoing surgery during October 2020. Patients from all surgical specialties were included. The primary outcome measure was venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis) within 30 days of surgery. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was defined as peri-operative (7 days before to 30 days after surgery); recent (1–6 weeks before surgery); previous (≥7 weeks before surgery); or none. Information on prophylaxis regimens or pre-operative anti-coagulation for baseline comorbidities was not available. Postoperative venous thromboembolism rate was 0.5% (666/123,591) in patients without SARS-CoV-2; 2.2% (50/2317) in patients with peri-operative SARS-CoV-2; 1.6% (15/953) in patients with recent SARS-CoV-2; and 1.0% (11/1148) in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2. After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with peri-operative (adjusted odds ratio 1.5 (95%CI 1.1–2.0)) and recent SARS-CoV-2 (1.9 (95%CI 1.2–3.3)) remained at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, with a borderline finding in previous SARS-CoV-2 (1.7 (95%CI 0.9–3.0)). Overall, venous thromboembolism was independently associated with 30-day mortality (5.4 (95%CI 4.3–6.7)). In patients with SARS-CoV-2, mortality without venous thromboembolism was 7.4% (319/4342) and with venous thromboembolism was 40.8% (31/76). Patients undergoing surgery with peri-operative or recent SARS-CoV-2 appear to be at increased risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism compared with patients with no his

Journal article

Fotopoulou C, Rockall A, Lu H, Lee P, Avesani G, Russo L, Petta F, Ataseven B, Waltering K-U, Koch JA, Crum WR, Cunnea P, Heitz F, Harter P, Aboagye EO, du Bois A, Prader Set al., 2021, Validation analysis of the novel imaging-based prognostic radiomic signature in patients undergoing primary surgery for advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), British Journal of Cancer, Vol: 126, Pages: 1047-1054, ISSN: 0007-0920

BackgroundPredictive models based on radiomics features are novel, highly promising approaches for gynaecological oncology. Here, we wish to assess the prognostic value of the newly discovered Radiomic Prognostic Vector (RPV) in an independent cohort of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients, treated within a Centre of Excellence, thus avoiding any bias in treatment quality.MethodsRPV was calculated using standardised algorithms following segmentation of routine preoperative imaging of patients (n = 323) who underwent upfront debulking surgery (01/2011-07/2018). RPV was correlated with operability, survival and adjusted for well-established prognostic factors (age, postoperative residual disease, stage), and compared to previous validation models.ResultsThe distribution of low, medium and high RPV scores was 54.2% (n = 175), 33.4% (n = 108) and 12.4% (n = 40) across the cohort, respectively. High RPV scores independently associated with significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.69; 95% CI:1.06–2.71; P = 0.038), even after adjusting for stage, age, performance status and residual disease. Moreover, lower RPV was significantly associated with total macroscopic tumour clearance (OR = 2.02; 95% CI:1.56–2.62; P = 0.00647).ConclusionsRPV was validated to independently identify those HGSOC patients who will not be operated tumour-free in an optimal setting, and those who will relapse early despite complete tumour clearance upfront. Further prospective, multicentre trials with a translational aspect are warranted for the incorporation of this radiomics approach into clinical routine.

Journal article

McLean KA, Kamarajah SK, Chaudhry D, Gujjuri RR, Raubenheimer K, Trout I, AlAmeer E, Creagh-Brown B, Harrison EM, Nepogodiev D, Roslani AC, Li E, Pata F, Medina AR-D, van Ramshorst GH, Valente DCA, Sayyed R, Simoes J, Smart N, Bhangu A, Glasbey JC, Khaw RA, Ahmed W, Akhbari M, Baker D, Borakati A, Mills E, Murray V, Thavayogan R, Yasin I, Glasbey J, Ridley W, Sarrami M, Zhang G, Egoroff N, Pockney P, Richards T, Edwards M, Lee M, Pinkney T, Pearse R, Vohra R, Sohrabi C, Jamieson A, Nguyen M, Rahman A, English C, Tincknell L, Kakodkar P, Kwek I, Punjabi N, Burns J, Varghese S, Erotocritou M, McGuckin S, Vayalapra S, Dominguez E, Moneim J, Bhatia S, Kouli O, Salehi M, Tan HL, Yoong A, Zhu L, Seale B, Nowinka Z, Patel N, Chrisp B, Harris J, Maleyko I, Muneeb F, Gough M, James CE, Skan O, Chowdhury A, Rebuffa N, Khan H, Down B, Fatimah HQ, Siaw-Acheampong K, Benson RA, Bywater E, Dawson BE, Evans JP, Heritage E, Jones CS, Khatri C, Keatley JM, Knight A, Lawday S, Mann HS, Marson EJ, Mckay SC, Mills EC, Pellino G, Picciochi M, Taylor EH, Tiwari A, Simoes JFF, Trout IM, Venn ML, Wilkin RJW, Smart NJ, Minaya-Bravo A, Gallo G, Moug S, Di Saverio S, Vallance A, Vimalchandran D, Griffiths EA, Evans RPT, Townend P, Roberts K, McKay S, Isaac J, Satoi S, Edwards J, Coonar AS, Marchbank A, Caruana EJ, Layton GR, Patel A, Brunelli A, Ford S, Desai A, Gronchi A, Fiore M, Almond M, Tirotta F, Dumitra S, Kolias A, Price SJ, Fountain DM, Jenkinson MD, Hutchinson P, Marcus HJ, Piper RJ, Lippa L, Servadei F, Esene I, Freyschlag C, Neville I, Rosseau G, Schaller K, Demetriades AK, Robertson F, Alamri A, Shaw R, Schache AG, Winter SC, Ho M, Nankivell P, Biel JR, Batstone M, Ganly I, Vidya R, Wilkins A, Singh JK, Thekinkattil D, Sundar S, Fotopoulou C, Leung E, Khan T, Chiva L, Sehouli J, Fagotti A, Cohen P, Gutelkin M, Ghebre R, Konney T, Pareja R, Bristow R, Dowdy S, Rajkumar STS, Ng J, Fujiwara K, Stewart GD, Lamb B, Narahari K, McNeill A, Colquhoun A, McGrath J, Bromage S, Barod R, Kaset al., 2021, Death following pulmonary complications of surgery before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, Vol: 108, Pages: 1448-1464, ISSN: 0007-1323

Journal article

Concin N, Planchamp F, Abu-Rustum NR, Ataseven B, Cibula D, Fagotti A, Fotopoulou C, Knapp P, Marth C, Morice P, Querleu D, Sehouli J, Stepanyan A, Taskiran C, Vergote I, Wimberger P, Zapardiel I, Persson Jet al., 2021, European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, Vol: 31, Pages: 1508-1529, ISSN: 1048-891X

Journal article

Armbrust R, Chekerov R, Sander S, Biebl M, Chopra S, Krell J, Rinne N, Nixon K, Fotopoulou C, Sehouli Jet al., 2021, Surgery due to mechanical bowel obstruction in relapsed ovarian cancer: clinical and surgical results of a bicentric analysis of 87 patients (Oct, 10.1007/s00404-021-06237-x, 2021), Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vol: 306, Pages: 291-292, ISSN: 0932-0067

Journal article

Glasbey J, Ademuyiwa A, Adisa A, AlAmeer E, Arnaud AP, Ayasra F, Azevedo J, Minaya-Bravo A, Costas-Chavarri A, Edwards J, Elhadi M, Fiore M, Fotopoulou C, Gallo G, Ghosh D, Griffiths EA, Harrison E, Hutchinson P, Lawani I, Lawday S, Lederhuber H, Leventoglu S, Li E, Gomes GMA, Mann H, Marson EJ, Martin J, Mazingi D, McLean K, Modolo M, Moore R, Morton D, Ntirenganya F, Pata F, Picciochi M, Pockney P, Ramos-De la Medina A, Roberts K, Roslani AC, Kottayasamy Seenivasagam R, Shaw R, Simões JFF, Smart N, Stewart GD, Sullivan R, Sundar S, Tabiri S, Taylor EH, Vidya R, Nepogodiev D, Bhangu A, Glasbey JC, McLean K, Nepogodiev D, Harrison E, Bhangu AA, Nepogodiev D, Siaw-Acheampong K, Benson RA, Bywater E, Chaudhry D, Dawson BE, Evans JP, Glasbey JC, Gujjuri RR, Heritage E, Jones CS, Kamarajah SK, Khatri C, Khaw RA, Keatley JM, Knight A, Lawday S, Li E, Mann HS, Marson EJ, McLean KA, Mckay SC, Mills EC, Pellino G, Picciochi M, Taylor EH, Tiwari A, Simoes JFF, Trout IM, Venn ML, Wilkin RJW, Bhangu A, Glasbey JC, Smart NJ, Minaya-Bravo A, Evans JP, Gallo G, Moug S, Pata F, Pockney P, Di Saverio S, Vallance A, Vimalchandran D, Griffiths EA, Kamarajah SK, Evans RPT, Townend P, Roberts K, McKay S, Isaac J, Satoi S, Edwards J, Coonar AS, Marchbank A, Caruana EJ, Layton GR, Patel A, Brunelli A, Ford S, Desai A, Gronchi A, Fiore M, Almond M, Tirotta F, Dumitra S, Kolias A, Price SJ, Fountain DM, Jenkinson MD, Hutchinson P, Marcus HJ, Piper RJ, Lippa L, Servadei F, Esene I, Freyschlag C, Neville I, Rosseau G, Schaller K, Demetriades AK, Robertson F, Alamri A, Shaw R, Schache AG, Winter SC, Ho M, Nankivell P, Rey Biel J, Batstone M, Ganly I, Vidya R, Wilkins A, Singh JK, Thekinkattil D, Sundar S, Fotopoulou C, Leung EYL, Khan T, Chiva L, Sehouli J, Fagotti A, Cohen P, Gutelkin M, Ghebre R, Konney T, Pareja R, Bristow R, Dowdy S, Shylasree TS, Kottayasamy Seenivasagam R, Ng J, Fujiwara K, Stewart GD, Lamb B, Narahari K, McNeill A, Colquhoun A, McGrath JS, Bromage S, Barod R, Kasivisvaet al., 2021, Effect of COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns on planned cancer surgery for 15 tumour types in 61 countries: an international, prospective, cohort study, The Lancet Oncology, Vol: 22, Pages: 1507-1517, ISSN: 1470-2045

BackgroundSurgery is the main modality of cure for solid cancers and was prioritised to continue during COVID-19 outbreaks. This study aimed to identify immediate areas for system strengthening by comparing the delivery of elective cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic in periods of lockdown versus light restriction.MethodsThis international, prospective, cohort study enrolled 20 006 adult (≥18 years) patients from 466 hospitals in 61 countries with 15 cancer types, who had a decision for curative surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic and were followed up until the point of surgery or cessation of follow-up (Aug 31, 2020). Average national Oxford COVID-19 Stringency Index scores were calculated to define the government response to COVID-19 for each patient for the period they awaited surgery, and classified into light restrictions (index <20), moderate lockdowns (20–60), and full lockdowns (>60). The primary outcome was the non-operation rate (defined as the proportion of patients who did not undergo planned surgery). Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to explore the associations between lockdowns and non-operation. Intervals from diagnosis to surgery were compared across COVID-19 government response index groups. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04384926.FindingsOf eligible patients awaiting surgery, 2003 (10·0%) of 20 006 did not receive surgery after a median follow-up of 23 weeks (IQR 16–30), all of whom had a COVID-19-related reason given for non-operation. Light restrictions were associated with a 0·6% non-operation rate (26 of 4521), moderate lockdowns with a 5·5% rate (201 of 3646; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·77–0·84; p<0·0001), and full lockdowns with a 15·0% rate (1775 of 11 827; HR 0·51, 0·50–0·53; p<0·0001). In sensitivity analyses, including adjustment for SARS-CoV-2 case notif

Journal article

This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.

Request URL: http://wlsprd.imperial.ac.uk:80/respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-html.jsp Request URI: /respub/WEB-INF/jsp/search-html.jsp Query String: id=00777052&limit=30&person=true&page=3&respub-action=search.html