Imperial College London

Prof. Christina Fotopoulou

Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Surgery & Cancer

Chair in Gynaecological Cancer Surgery
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

c.fotopoulou

 
 
//

Location

 

Institute of Reproductive and Developmental BiologyHammersmith Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Rockall:2021:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1834,
author = {Rockall, A and Barwick, T and Wilson, W and Singh, N and Bharwani, N and Sohaib, A and Nobbenhuis, M and Warbey, V and Miquel, M and Koh, D-M and De, Paepe KN and Martin-Hirsch, P and Ghaem-Maghami, S and Fotopoulou, C and Stringfellow, H and Sundar, S and Manchanda, R and Sahdev, A and Hackshaw, A and Cook, GJ and MAPPING, Study Group},
doi = {10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1834},
journal = {Clinical Cancer Research},
pages = {6457--6466},
title = {Diagnostic accuracy of FEC-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of nodal metastases in surgically treated endometrial and cervical carcinoma},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1834},
volume = {27},
year = {2021}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - Purpose:Pre-operative nodal staging is important for planning treatment in cervical cancer (CC) and endometrial cancer (EC) but remains challenging. We compare nodal staging accuracy of 18F-ethyl-choline-(FEC)-PET/CT, 18F-Fluoro-deoxy-glucose-(FDG)-PET/CT and diffusion-weighted-MRI (DW-MRI) with conventional morphological MRI.Experimetal Design:A prospective, multicentre observational study of diagnostic accuracy for nodal metastases was undertaken in 5 gyne-oncology centres. FEC-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT and DW-MRI were compared to nodal size and morphology on MRI. Reference standard was strictly correlated nodal histology. Eligibility included operable CC stage=>1B1 or EC (grade 3 any stage with myometrial invasion or grade 1-2 stage=>II). Results:Among 162 consenting participants, 136 underwent study DW-MRI and FDG-PET/CT, and 60 underwent FEC-PET/CT. 267 nodal regions in 118 women were strictly correlated at histology (nodal positivity rate 25%). Sensitivity per-patient (n=118) for nodal size, morphology, DW-MRI, FDG- and FEC-PET/CT were 40%, 53%, 53%, 63% and 67% for all cases (p=0.016); 10%, 10%, 20%, 30% and 25% in CC (n=40); 65%, 75%, 70%, 80% and 88% in EC (n=78). FDG-PET/CT outperformed nodal size (p=0.006) and size ratio (p=0.04) for per-region sensitivity. False positive rates were all <10%. Conclusions:All imaging techniques had low sensitivity for detection of nodal metastases and cannot replace surgical nodal staging. The performance of FEC-PET/CT was not statistically different to other techniques that are more widely available. FDG-PET/CT had higher sensitivity than size in detecting nodal metastases. False positive rates were low across all methods. The low false positive rate demonstrated by FDG-PET/CT may be helpful in arbitration of challenging surgical planning decisions.
AU - Rockall,A
AU - Barwick,T
AU - Wilson,W
AU - Singh,N
AU - Bharwani,N
AU - Sohaib,A
AU - Nobbenhuis,M
AU - Warbey,V
AU - Miquel,M
AU - Koh,D-M
AU - De,Paepe KN
AU - Martin-Hirsch,P
AU - Ghaem-Maghami,S
AU - Fotopoulou,C
AU - Stringfellow,H
AU - Sundar,S
AU - Manchanda,R
AU - Sahdev,A
AU - Hackshaw,A
AU - Cook,GJ
AU - MAPPING,Study Group
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1834
EP - 6466
PY - 2021///
SN - 1078-0432
SP - 6457
TI - Diagnostic accuracy of FEC-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT and diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of nodal metastases in surgically treated endometrial and cervical carcinoma
T2 - Clinical Cancer Research
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1834
UR - https://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/early/2021/09/14/1078-0432.CCR-21-1834
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/91630
VL - 27
ER -