Imperial College London

Dr Chris Tomlinson

Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Surgery & Cancer

Honorary Research Fellow
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

chris.tomlinson

 
 
//

Location

 

Burlington DanesHammersmith Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Harries:2018:10.1186/s12909-018-1131-4,
author = {Harries, P and Unsworth, C and Gokalp, H and Davies, M and Tomlinson, C and Harries, L},
doi = {10.1186/s12909-018-1131-4},
journal = {BMC Medical Education},
title = {A randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of decision training on assessors’ ability to determine optimal fitness-to-drive recommendations for older or disabled drivers},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1131-4},
volume = {18},
year = {2018}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - BackgroundDriving licensing jurisdictions require detailed assessments of fitness-to-drive from occupational therapy driver assessors (OTDAs). We developed decision training based on the recommendations of expert OTDAs, to enhance novices’ capacity to make optimal fitness-to-drive decisions. The aim of this research was to determine effectiveness of training on novice occupational therapists’ ability to make fitness-to-drive decisions.MethodsA double blind, parallel, randomised controlled trial was conducted to test the effectiveness of decision training on novices’ fitness-to-drive recommendations. Both groups made recommendations on a series of 64 case scenarios with the intervention group receiving training after reviewing two thirds of the cases; the control group, at this same point, just received a message of encouragement to continue. Participants were occupational therapy students on UK and Australian pre-registration programmes who individually took part online, following the website instructions. The main outcome of training was the reduction in mean difference between novice and expert recommendations on the cases.ResultsTwo hundred eighty-nine novices were randomised into intervention; 166 completed the trial (70 in intervention; 96 in control). No statistical differences in scores were found pre-training. Post training, the control group showed no significant change in recommendations compared to the experts (t(96) = −.69; p = .5), whereas the intervention group exhibited a significant change (t(69) = 6.89; p < 0.001). For the intervention group, the mean difference compared with the experts’ recommendations reduced with 95% CI from −.13 to .09. Effect size calculated at the post-training demonstrated a moderate effect (d = .69, r = .32).ConclusionsNovices who received the decision training were able to change their recommendations
AU - Harries,P
AU - Unsworth,C
AU - Gokalp,H
AU - Davies,M
AU - Tomlinson,C
AU - Harries,L
DO - 10.1186/s12909-018-1131-4
PY - 2018///
SN - 1472-6920
TI - A randomised controlled trial to test the effectiveness of decision training on assessors’ ability to determine optimal fitness-to-drive recommendations for older or disabled drivers
T2 - BMC Medical Education
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1131-4
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/63051
VL - 18
ER -