Publications
47 results found
Aune D, Chan DSM, Vieira AR, et al., 2012, Dietary fructose, carbohydrates, glycemic indices and pancreatic cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies, ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, Vol: 23, Pages: 2536-2546, ISSN: 0923-7534
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 65
Druesne-Pecollo N, Touvier M, Barrandon E, et al., 2012, Excess body weight and second primary cancer risk after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies, BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, Vol: 135, Pages: 647-654, ISSN: 0167-6806
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 87
Aune D, Vieira AR, Chan DSM, et al., 2012, Height and pancreatic cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies, CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, Vol: 23, Pages: 1213-1222, ISSN: 0957-5243
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 25
Aune D, Chan DSM, Vieira AR, et al., 2012, Dietary compared with blood concentrations of carotenoids and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, Vol: 96, Pages: 356-373, ISSN: 0002-9165
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 95
Romaguera D, Vergnaud A-C, Peeters PH, et al., 2012, Is concordance with World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines for cancer prevention related to subsequent risk of cancer? Results from the EPIC study, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, Vol: 96, Pages: 150-163, ISSN: 0002-9165
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 239
Aune D, Chan DSM, Vieira AR, et al., 2012, Fruits, vegetables and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies, BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, Vol: 134, Pages: 479-493, ISSN: 0167-6806
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 133
Aune D, Chan DSM, Greenwood DC, et al., 2012, Dietary fiber and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies, ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, Vol: 23, Pages: 1394-1402, ISSN: 0923-7534
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 151
Aune D, Chan DSM, Lau R, et al., 2012, Carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load, and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies, CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, Vol: 23, Pages: 521-535, ISSN: 0957-5243
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 46
Aune D, Greenwood DC, Chan DSM, et al., 2012, Body mass index, abdominal fatness and pancreatic cancer risk: a systematic review and non-linear dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies, ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, Vol: 23, Pages: 843-852, ISSN: 0923-7534
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 316
Aune D, Lau R, Chan DSM, et al., 2012, Dairy products and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies., Ann Oncol, Vol: 23, Pages: 37-45
BACKGROUND: Previous studies of the association between intake of dairy products and colorectal cancer risk have indicated an inverse association with milk, however, the evidence for cheese or other dairy products is inconsistent. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the shape of the dose-response relationship between dairy products and colorectal cancer risk. We searched the PubMed database for prospective studies published up to May 2010. Summary relative risks (RRs) were estimated using a random effects model. RESULTS: Nineteen cohort studies were included. The summary RR was 0.83 (95% CI [confidence interval]: 0.78-0.88, I2 = 25%) per 400 g/day of total dairy products, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94, I2 = 0%) per 200 g/day of milk intake and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.83-1.12, I2 = 28%) per 50 g/day of cheese. Inverse associations were observed in both men and women but were restricted to colon cancer. There was evidence of a nonlinear association between milk and total dairy products and colorectal cancer risk, P < 0.001, and the inverse associations appeared to be the strongest at the higher range of intake. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that milk and total dairy products, but not cheese or other dairy products, are associated with a reduction in colorectal cancer risk.
Aune D, Lau R, Chan DSM, et al., 2012, Dairy products and colorectal cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies, ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, Vol: 23, Pages: 37-45, ISSN: 0923-7534
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 221
Aune D, Rosenblatt DN, Chan DSM, et al., 2012, Dietary carbohydrates, glycemic index, glycemic load and endometrial cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, Vol: 71, Pages: E170-E170, ISSN: 0029-6651
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 1
Aune D, Chan DSM, Lau R, et al., 2011, Dietary fibre, whole grains, and risk of colorectal cancer: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies, BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, Vol: 343, ISSN: 1756-1833
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 485
Aune D, Lau R, Chan DSM, et al., 2011, Nonlinear Reduction in Risk for Colorectal Cancer by Fruit and Vegetable Intake Based on Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies, GASTROENTEROLOGY, Vol: 141, Pages: 106-118, ISSN: 0016-5085
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 191
Chan DSM, Lau R, Aune D, et al., 2011, Red and processed meat and colorectal cancer incidence: meta-analysis of prospective studies, PLoS ONE, Vol: 6, Pages: 1-11, ISSN: 1932-6203
BackgroundThe evidence that red and processed meat influences colorectal carcinogenesis was judged convincing in the 2007 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research report. Since then, ten prospective studies have published new results. Here we update the evidence from prospective studies and explore whether there is a non-linear association of red and processed meats with colorectal cancer risk.Methods and FindingsRelevant prospective studies were identified in PubMed until March 2011. For each study, relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted and pooled with a random-effects model, weighting for the inverse of the variance, in highest versus lowest intake comparison, and dose-response meta-analyses. Red and processed meats intake was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk. The summary relative risk (RR) of colorectal cancer for the highest versus the lowest intake was 1.22 (95% CI = 1.11−1.34) and the RR for every 100 g/day increase was 1.14 (95% CI = 1.04−1.24). Non-linear dose-response meta-analyses revealed that colorectal cancer risk increases approximately linearly with increasing intake of red and processed meats up to approximately 140 g/day, where the curve approaches its plateau. The associations were similar for colon and rectal cancer risk. When analyzed separately, colorectal cancer risk was related to intake of fresh red meat (RR for 100 g/day increase = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05−1.31) and processed meat (RR for 50 g/day increase = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.10−1.28). Similar results were observed for colon cancer, but for rectal cancer, no significant associations were observed.ConclusionsHigh intake of red and processed meat is associated with significant increased risk of colorectal, colon and rectal cancers. The overall evidence of prospective studies supports limiting red and processed meat consumption as one of the dietary recommendations for the prevention of colorectal cancer.
Touvier M, Chan DSM, Lau R, et al., 2011, Meta-Analyses of Vitamin D Intake, 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Status, Vitamin D Receptor Polymorphisms, and Colorectal Cancer Risk, CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, Vol: 20, Pages: 1003-1016, ISSN: 1055-9965
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 162
Latino-Martel P, Chan DSM, Druesne-Pecollo N, et al., 2010, Maternal Alcohol Consumption during Pregnancy and Risk of Childhood Leukemia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, Vol: 19, Pages: 1238-1260, ISSN: 1055-9965
- Author Web Link
- Cite
- Citations: 64
This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.