Imperial College London
Portrait Picture

ProfessorDarioFarina

Faculty of Engineering, Department of Bioengineering

Chair in Neurorehabilitation Engineering
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 1387d.farina Website

 
 
//

Location

 

RSM 4.15Royal School of MinesSouth Kensington Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Besomi:2019:10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.07.008,
author = {Besomi, M and Hodges, PW and Van, Dieën J and Carson, RG and Clancy, EA and Disselhorst-Klug, C and Holobar, A and Hug, F and Kiernan, MC and Lowery, M and McGill, K and Merletti, R and Perreault, E and Søgaard, K and Tucker, K and Besier, T and Enoka, R and Falla, D and Farina, D and Gandevia, S and Rothwell, JC and Vicenzino, B and Wrigley, T},
doi = {10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.07.008},
journal = {J Electromyogr Kinesiol},
pages = {128--144},
title = {Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: Electrode selection matrix.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.07.008},
volume = {48},
year = {2019}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - The Consensus for Experimental Design in Electromyography (CEDE) project is an international initiative which aims to guide decision-making in recording, analysis, and interpretation of electromyographic (EMG) data. The quality of the EMG recording, and validity of its interpretation depend on many characteristics of the recording set-up and analysis procedures. Different electrode types (i.e., surface and intramuscular) will influence the recorded signal and its interpretation. This report presents a matrix to consider the best electrode type selection for recording EMG, and the process undertaken to achieve consensus. Four electrode types were considered: (1) conventional surface electrode, (2) surface matrix or array electrode, (3) fine-wire electrode, and (4) needle electrode. General features, pros, and cons of each electrode type are presented first. This information is followed by recommendations for specific types of muscles, the information that can be estimated, the typical representativeness of the recording and the types of contractions for which the electrode is best suited. This matrix is intended to help researchers when selecting and reporting the electrode type in EMG studies.
AU  - Besomi,M
AU  - Hodges,PW
AU  - Van,Dieën J
AU  - Carson,RG
AU  - Clancy,EA
AU  - Disselhorst-Klug,C
AU  - Holobar,A
AU  - Hug,F
AU  - Kiernan,MC
AU  - Lowery,M
AU  - McGill,K
AU  - Merletti,R
AU  - Perreault,E
AU  - Søgaard,K
AU  - Tucker,K
AU  - Besier,T
AU  - Enoka,R
AU  - Falla,D
AU  - Farina,D
AU  - Gandevia,S
AU  - Rothwell,JC
AU  - Vicenzino,B
AU  - Wrigley,T
DO  - 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.07.008
EP  - 144
PY  - 2019///
SP  - 128
TI  - Consensus for experimental design in electromyography (CEDE) project: Electrode selection matrix.
T2  - J Electromyogr Kinesiol
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.07.008
UR  - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31352156
VL  - 48
ER  -
Download