Imperial College London

Erik Mayer

Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Surgery & Cancer

Clinical Reader in Urology
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

e.mayer Website

 
 
//

Location

 

1020Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Wing (QEQM)St Mary's Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{van:2022:10.1177/13558196211029323,
author = {van, Dael J and Smalley, K and Gillespie, A and Reader, T and Papadimitriou, D and Glampson, B and Marshall, D and Mayer, E},
doi = {10.1177/13558196211029323},
journal = {Journal of Health Services Research and Policy},
pages = {41--49},
title = {Getting the whole story: integrating patient complaints and staff reports of unsafe care},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13558196211029323},
volume = {27},
year = {2022}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - Objective: It is increasingly recognized that patient safety requires heterogeneous insights from a range of stakeholders, yet incident reporting systems in health care still primarily rely on staff perspectives. This paper examines the potential of combining insights from patient complaints and staff incident reports for a more comprehensive understanding of the causes and severity of harm. Methods: Using five years of patient complaints and staff incident reporting data at a large multi-site hospital in London (in the United Kingdom), this study conducted retrospective patient-level data linkage to identify overlapping reports. Using a combination of quantitative coding and in-depth qualitative analysis, we then compared level of harm reported, identified descriptions of adjacent events missed by the other party and examined combined narratives of mutually identified events. Results: Incidents where complaints and incident reports overlapped (n=446, 8.5% of all complaints and 0.6% of all incident reports) represented a small but critical area of investigation, with significantly higher rates of Serious Incidents and severe harm. Linked complaints described greater harm from safety incidents in 60% of cases, reported many surrounding safety events missed by staff (n=582), and provided contesting stories of why problems occurred in 46% cases, and complementary accounts in 26% cases.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the value of using patient complaints to supplement, test, and challenge staff reports, including to provide greater insight on the many potential factors that may give rise to unsafe care. Accordingly, we propose that a more holistic analysis of critical safety incidents can be achieved through combining heterogeneous data from different viewpoints, such as better integration of patient complaints and staff incident reporting data.
AU - van,Dael J
AU - Smalley,K
AU - Gillespie,A
AU - Reader,T
AU - Papadimitriou,D
AU - Glampson,B
AU - Marshall,D
AU - Mayer,E
DO - 10.1177/13558196211029323
EP - 49
PY - 2022///
SN - 1355-8196
SP - 41
TI - Getting the whole story: integrating patient complaints and staff reports of unsafe care
T2 - Journal of Health Services Research and Policy
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/13558196211029323
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/90164
VL - 27
ER -