Imperial College London
Portrait Picture

DrFelixGreaves

Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health

Clinical Reader in Public Health
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

felix.greaves08

 
 
//

Location

 

Charing Cross HospitalCharing Cross Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Karpathakis:2021:10.2196/preprints.28356,
author = {Karpathakis, K and Libow, G and Potts, HWW and Dixon, S and Greaves, F and Murray, E},
doi = {10.2196/preprints.28356},
title = {An Evaluation Service for Digital Public Health Interventions: User-Centered Design Approach (Preprint)},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/preprints.28356},
year = {2021}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - <sec>                    <title>BACKGROUND</title>                        <p>Digital health interventions (DHIs) have the potential to improve public health by combining effective interventions and population reach. However, what biomedical researchers and digital developers consider an effective intervention differs, thereby creating an ongoing challenge to integrating their respective approaches when evaluating DHIs.</p>                </sec>                                <sec>                    <title>OBJECTIVE</title>                        <p>This study aims to report on the Public Health England (PHE) initiative set out to operationalize an evaluation framework that combines biomedical and digital approaches and demonstrates the impact, cost-effectiveness, and benefit of DHIs on public health.</p>                </sec>                                <sec>                    <title>METHODS</title>                        <p>We comprised a multidisciplinary project team including service designers, academics, and public health professionals and used user-centered design methods, such as qualitative research, engagement with end users and stakeholders, and iterative learning. The iterative approach enabled the team to sequentially define the problem, understand user needs, identify opportunity areas, develop concepts, test prototypes, and plan service implementation. Stakeholders, senior leaders from PHE, and a working group critiqued the outputs.</p>                </sec>                                <sec>                    <title>RESULTS</title>                        <p>We identified 26 themes and 82 user needs from semistructured interviews (N=15), expressed as 46 Jobs To Be Done, which were then validated across the journey of evaluation design for a DHI. We identified seven essential concepts for evaluating DHIs: evaluation
AU  - Karpathakis,K
AU  - Libow,G
AU  - Potts,HWW
AU  - Dixon,S
AU  - Greaves,F
AU  - Murray,E
DO  - 10.2196/preprints.28356
PY  - 2021///
TI  - An Evaluation Service for Digital Public Health Interventions: User-Centered Design Approach (Preprint)
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/preprints.28356
ER  -
Download