Publications
11 results found
Harrison R, McArdle I, Phillips D, et al., 2020, Imperial College London, 2019/20 RCUK open access compliance report, Imperial College London, 2019/20 RCUK open access compliance report
This is the annual report to RCUK which records open access article processing charges paid from Imperial's Research Councils UK (RCUK) open access budget between 1 April 2019 and 31 March 2020, along with Imperial's overall compliance with the RCUK open access policy. The report was presented to UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) in August 2020.
Phillips D, Harrison R, Agunbiade S, et al., 2019, Imperial College London, 2018/19 RCUK open access compliance report, Imperial College London, 2018/19 RCUK open access compliance report
This is the annual report to RCUK which records open access article processing charges paid from Imperial's Research Councils UK (RCUK) open access budget between 1 April 2018 and 31 March 2019, along with Imperial's overall compliance with the RCUK open access policy. The report was presented to UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) in May 2018.Please note that the compliance percentage was calculated based on a sample of some 2K College outputs that acknowledge RCUK funding.
Harrison R, Hibbert R, Murtagh J, et al., 2018, Imperial College London, 2017/18 RCUK open access compliance report, Imperial College London, 2017/18 RCUK open access compliance report
This is the annual report to RCUK on College compliance with the RCUK open access policy. It includes and overview of block grant spend on article processing charges. Please note that the compliance percentage was calculated based on a sample of some 2K College outputs that acknowledge RCUK funding.
Harrison R, Mulvaney N, Murtagh J, et al., 2017, Imperial College London, 2016/17 RCUK open access compliance report, Imperial College London, 2015/16 RCUK open access compliance report
This is the annual report to RCUK on College compliance with the RCUK open access policy. It includes and overview of block grant spend on article processing charges. Please note that the compliance percentage was calculated based on a sample of some 2K College outputs that acknowledge RCUK funding.
Reimer TF, mcardle I, mulvaney, et al., 2016, Imperial College London, 2015/16 RCUK open access compliance report
This is the annual report to RCUK on College compliance with the RCUK open access policy. It includes and overview of block grant spend on article processing charges. Please note that the compliance percentage was calculated based on a sample of some 2K College outputs that acknowledge RCUK funding.
McArdle IJ, Clements A, Reddick G, et al., 2016, Let’s Talk : Interoperability between University CRIS/IR and Researchfish – a case study from the UK, CRIS2016, Publisher: Elsevier: Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives License, ISSN: 1877-0509
Research funders and research organisations both require feedback on the progress, productivity and quality of the research they support. This information originates with researchers, but may be captured in a variety of systems including University CRIS/IR and funder systems. In 2014 all 7 national Research Councils (collectively referred to as RCUK) implemented a harmonised approach to the collection of research output data currently supported by Researchfish Ltd (referred to as the Researchfish® system). In 2016 this process is gathering feedback from over 60,000 researchers in all UK Universities, tracking more than £40billion of public and charity research investment and is adding to a dataset of more than 1 million outputs.Researchers, research managers and funders want to find ways to capture this data once and achieve wide re-use of the information. Working together University and Research Council officers, Researchfish Ltd. And Jisc have highlighted that it is important for the “interoperability” between research information systems to be improved. These organisations have started a programme of work to improve the flow of information between University and funder systems.
Reimer TF, McArdle I, 2016, Encouraging innovation in Research Data Management. The "RDM Green Shoots" initiative at Imperial College London, Journal of Digital Media Management
Academics consume and create data in ever increasing quantities. Petabyte-scale data is no longer unusual on a project level, and even more common when looking at outputs of whole research institutions. Despite the large amounts of data being produced, data curation is relatively less well developed. In 2014 Imperial College London ran a research data management (RDM) pilot. Designed as a bottom-up, academically-driven initiative, six “Green Shoots” projects were funded to identify and generate exemplars of best practice in RDM. The Green Shoots form part of a wider programme designed to help the College to develop a suitable RDM infrastructure and to embed best practice across the university. This article sets out the context for the initiative, describes the development of the pilot, summarises the individual projects and discusses lessons learned.
McArdle I, Fare C, Bearpark M, et al., 2015, Research Data Management 'Green Shoots' Pilot Programme, Final Reports, Research Data Management 'Green Shoots' Pilot Programme, Final Reports
This document contains the final reports of six Research Data Management "Green Shoots" projects run at Imperial College in 2014.
Reimer TF, Mclean A, McArdle I, et al., 2015, Imperial College London, 2014/15 RCUK Open Access Compliance Report
This report on the spend of the open access block grant was submitted to RCUK on 30th October 2015. It has been compiled based on the RCUK guidance: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/documents/OA/RCUKOAreportingGuidance.pdf
McArdle IJ, Conway S, Green JT, et al., 2012, Snowball Metrics Recipe Book - Their Application in the United Kingdom, Snowball Metrics Recipe Book - Their Application in the United Kingdom
Green JT, McArdle IJ, Rutherford SL, et al., 2010, Developing tools to inform the management of research and translating existing good practice, Developing tools to inform the management of research and translating existing good practice
This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.