Imperial College London

ProfessorIainMcNeish

Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Surgery & Cancer

Chair in Oncology
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 2185i.mcneish Website

 
 
//

Assistant

 

Ms Sophie Lions +44 (0)20 7594 2792

 
//

Location

 

G036Institute of Reproductive and Developmental BiologyHammersmith Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Rust:2018:10.1111/1471-0528.15171,
author = {Rust, K and Spiliopoulou, P and Tang, CY and Bell, C and Stirling, D and Phang, THF and Davidson, R and Mackean, M and Nussey, F and Glasspool, R and Reed, N and Sadozye, A and Porteous, M and McGoldrick, T and Ferguson, M and Miedzybrodzka, Z and McNeish, IA and Gourley, C},
doi = {10.1111/1471-0528.15171},
journal = {BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology},
pages = {1451--1548},
title = {Routine germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in ovarian carcinoma patients: analysis of the Scottish real life experience},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15171},
volume = {125},
year = {2018}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - Objective:To determine the rate of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Scottish ovarian cancer patients before and after a change in testing policy.Design:Retrospective cohort study.Setting:Four cancer/genetics centres in Scotland.Population:Ovarian cancer patients undergoing germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2) gene sequencing before 2013 (‘old criteria’; selection based solely on family history), after 2013 (‘new criteria’; sequencing offered to newly presenting non-mucinous ovarian cancer patients) and the ‘prevalent population’ (who presented before 2013, were not eligible for sequencing under the old criteria but were sequenced under the new criteria).Methods:Clinicopathological and sequence data were collected before and for 18 months after this change in selection criteria.Main Outcome Measures:Frequency of germline BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C and RAD51D mutations.Results:Of 599 patients sequenced, 205, 236 and 158 were in the ‘old criteria’, ‘new criteria’ and ‘prevalent’ populations respectively. The frequency of gBRCA1/2 mutations was 30.7%, 13.1% and 12.7% respectively. The annual rate of gBRCA1/2 mutation detection was 4.2 before and 20.7 after the policy change. 48% (15/31) ‘new criteria’ patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations had a Manchester score <15 and would not have been offered sequencing based on family history criteria. In addition, 20 gBRCA1/2 patients were identified in the prevalent population. The prevalence of gBRCA1/2 mutations in patients >70 years was 8.2%.Conclusions:Sequencing all non-mucinous ovarian cancer patients produces much higher annual gBRCA1/2 mutation detection with the frequency of positive tests still exceeding the 10% threshold upon which many family history based models operate.
AU - Rust,K
AU - Spiliopoulou,P
AU - Tang,CY
AU - Bell,C
AU - Stirling,D
AU - Phang,THF
AU - Davidson,R
AU - Mackean,M
AU - Nussey,F
AU - Glasspool,R
AU - Reed,N
AU - Sadozye,A
AU - Porteous,M
AU - McGoldrick,T
AU - Ferguson,M
AU - Miedzybrodzka,Z
AU - McNeish,IA
AU - Gourley,C
DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.15171
EP - 1548
PY - 2018///
SN - 1470-0328
SP - 1451
TI - Routine germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in ovarian carcinoma patients: analysis of the Scottish real life experience
T2 - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15171
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29460478
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/57306
VL - 125
ER -