Imperial College London

ProfessorJamesBarlow

Business School

Chair in Technology and Innovation Management
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 5936j.barlow Website CV

 
 
//

Assistant

 

Mrs Lorraine Sheehy +44 (0)20 7594 9173

 
//

Location

 

Room 197EBusiness School BuildingSouth Kensington Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Antonacci:2018:10.1177/0951484818770411,
author = {Antonacci, G and Reed, JE and Lennox, L and Barlow, J},
doi = {10.1177/0951484818770411},
journal = {Health Services Management Research},
pages = {74--84},
title = {The use of process mapping in healthcare quality improvement projects},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0951484818770411},
volume = {31},
year = {2018}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - Introduction: Process Mapping (PM), provides insight into systems and processes in which improvement interventions are introduced and is seen as useful in healthcare Quality Improvement (QI) projects. There is little empirical evidence on the use of PM in healthcare practice. This study advances understanding of the benefits and success factors of PM within QI projects. Methods: Eight QI projects were purposively selected from different healthcare settings within the UK’s National Health Service. Data was gathered from multiple data-sources, including interviews exploring participants’ experience of using PM in their projects and perceptions of benefits and challenges related to its use. These were analysed using inductive analysis. Results: Eight key benefits related to PM use were reported by participants (gathering a shared understanding of the reality; identifying improvement opportunities; engaging stakeholders in the project; defining project's objectives; monitoring project progress; learning; increased empathy; simplicity of the method) and five factors related to successful PM exercises (simple and appropriate visual representation, information gathered from multiple stakeholders, facilitator’s experience and soft skills, basic training, iterative use of PM throughout the project). Conclusions: Findings highlight benefits and versatility of PM and provide practical suggestions to improve its use in practice.
AU - Antonacci,G
AU - Reed,JE
AU - Lennox,L
AU - Barlow,J
DO - 10.1177/0951484818770411
EP - 84
PY - 2018///
SN - 0951-4848
SP - 74
TI - The use of process mapping in healthcare quality improvement projects
T2 - Health Services Management Research
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0951484818770411
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/58466
VL - 31
ER -