Imperial College London
Portrait Picture

Dr Janet Deane

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer

Honorary Research Associate
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

j.deane

 
 
//

Location

 

Biodynamics Laboratory, 7th FlooCharing Cross HospitalCharing Cross Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Deane:2016:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011075,
author = {Deane, JA and Mcgregor, A},
doi = {10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011075},
journal = {BMJ Open},
title = {Current and Future Perspectives on Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease: a UK survey exploring specialist multidisciplinary clinical opinion.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011075},
volume = {6},
year = {2016}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - Objectives: Despite lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD) being significantly associatedwith non-specific low back pain and effective treatment remaining elusive, specialistmultidisciplinary clinical stakeholder opinion remains unexplored. The present studyexamines the views of such experts.Design: A reliable and valid electronic survey was designed to establish trends usingtheoretical constructs relating to current assessment and management practices. Cliniciansfrom the Society of Back Pain Research (SBPR) U.K. were invited to take part. Quantitativedata was collated and coded using Bristol On-line Surveys (BOS) software, and contentanalysis used to systematically code and categorise qualitative data.Setting: Specialist multidisciplinary spinal interest group in the U.K.Participants: 38/141 clinically active, multidisciplinary SBPR members with specialistspinal interest participated. 84% had greater than 9 years postgraduate clinical experience.Interventions: NoneOutcome Measures: Frequency distributions were used to establish general trends inquantitative data. Qualitative responses were coded and categorised in relation to each themeand percentage responses calculated.Results: LDDD symptom recurrence, in the absence of psychosocial influence, wasassociated with physical signs of joint stiffness (26%), weakness (17%), joint hypermobility(6%), while physical factors (21%) and the ability to adapt (11%) were postulated as reasonswhy some experience pain and others do not. No one management strategy was supportedexclusively or with consensus. Regarding effective modalities, there was no significantdifference between AHP and Medic responses (p= 0.1-0.9). The future of LDDD care wasexpressed in terms of improvements in patient communication (35%), patient education(38%) and treatment stratification (24%).
AU  - Deane,JA
AU  - Mcgregor,A
DO  - 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011075
PY  - 2016///
SN  - 2044-6055
TI  - Current and Future Perspectives on Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease: a UK survey exploring specialist multidisciplinary clinical opinion.
T2  - BMJ Open
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011075
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/40837
VL  - 6
ER  -
Download