Imperial College London
Portrait Picture

Dr Jon Otter

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Infectious Disease

Honorary Senior Lecturer
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

j.otter Website CV

 
 
//

Location

 

Clarence WingSt Mary's Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Castro-Sanchez:2020:10.1016/j.jhin.2020.12.004,
author = {Castro-Sanchez, E and Alexander, CM and Atchison, C and Patel, D and Leung, W and Calamita, ME and Garcia, DM and Cimpeanu, C and Mumbwatasai, JM and Ramid, D and Doherty, K and Grewal, HS and Otter, JA and Wells, EM},
doi = {10.1016/j.jhin.2020.12.004},
journal = {Journal of Hospital Infection},
pages = {68--7},
title = {Evaluation of a personal protective equipment (PPE) support programme ('PPE Helpers') for staff during the COVID-19 pandemic in London},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.12.004},
volume = {109},
year = {2020}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has presented one of the biggest challenges to healthcare providers worldwide. The appropriate use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) has been essential to ensuring staff and patient safety. To counteract sub-optimal PPE practice, a PPE helper programme was developed at a large London hospital group. Based on a behaviour change model of Capability, Opportunity and Motivation (COM-B), the programme provided PPE support, advice and education to ward staff.AimEvaluation of the PPE Helper Programme.MethodsClinical and non-clinical ward staff completed a questionnaire informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B. The questionnaire was available in paper and electronic versions. Quantitative responses were analysed using descriptive and non-parametric statistics, free-text responses were analysed thematically.FindingsOver a six-week period, PPE helpers made 268 ward visits. Overall, 261 questionnaires were available for analysis. Across the Trust, 68% of respondents reported having had contact with a PPE helper. Staff who had encountered a PPE helper responded significantly more positively to a range of statements about using PPE than those who had not. Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) staff were significantly more anxious in relation to the adequacy of PPE. Non-clinical and redeployed staff (e.g. domestic staff) were most positive about the impact of PPE helpers. Free-text comments showed that staff found the programme supportive and would have liked it earlier in the pandemic.ConclusionA PPE Helper programme is a feasible and beneficial intervention for providing support, advice and education to ward staff during infectious disease outbreaks.
AU  - Castro-Sanchez,E
AU  - Alexander,CM
AU  - Atchison,C
AU  - Patel,D
AU  - Leung,W
AU  - Calamita,ME
AU  - Garcia,DM
AU  - Cimpeanu,C
AU  - Mumbwatasai,JM
AU  - Ramid,D
AU  - Doherty,K
AU  - Grewal,HS
AU  - Otter,JA
AU  - Wells,EM
DO  - 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.12.004
EP  - 7
PY  - 2020///
SN  - 0195-6701
SP  - 68
TI  - Evaluation of a personal protective equipment (PPE) support programme ('PPE Helpers') for staff during the COVID-19 pandemic in London
T2  - Journal of Hospital Infection
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.12.004
UR  - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670120305570?via%3Dihub
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/87423
VL  - 109
ER  -
Download