Imperial College London

ProfessorJenniferQuint

Faculty of MedicineSchool of Public Health

Professor of Respiratory Epidemiology
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 8821j.quint

 
 
//

Location

 

.922Sir Michael Uren HubWhite City Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Bachtiger:2021:10.2196/30460,
author = {Bachtiger, P and Adamson, A and Maclean, WA and Kelshiker, MA and Quint, JK and Peters, NS},
doi = {10.2196/30460},
journal = {JMIR Public Health and Surveillance},
pages = {1--14},
title = {Determinants of shielding behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic and associations with wellbeing in >7,000 NHS patients: 17-week longitudinal observational study.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30460},
volume = {7},
year = {2021}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - BACKGROUND: The UK National Health Service (NHS) classified 2.2 million people as clinically extremely vulnerable (CEV) during the first wave of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, advising them to 'shield' - to not leave home for any reason. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure the determinants of shielding behaviour and associations with wellbeing in a large NHS patient population, towards informing future health policy. METHODS: Patients contributing to an ongoing longitudinal participatory epidemiology study (LoC-19, n = 42,924) received weekly email invitations to complete questionnaires (17-week shielding period starting 9th April 2020) within their NHS personal electronic health record. Question items focused on wellbeing. Participants were stratified into four groups by self-reported CEV status (qualifying condition) and adoption of shielding behaviour (baselined at week 1 or 2). Distribution of CEV criteria is reported alongside situational variables and uni- and multivariable logistic regression. Longitudinal trends in physical and mental wellbeing were displayed graphically. Free-text responses reporting variables impacting wellbeing were semi-quantified using natural language processing. In the lead up to a second national lockdown (October 23rd, 2020), a follow-up questionnaire evaluated subjective concern if further shielding were advised. RESULTS: 7,240 participants were included. Among the CEV (2,391), 1,133 (47.3%) assumed shielding behaviour at baseline, compared with 633 (15.0%) in the non-CEV group. Those CEV who shielded were more likely to be Asian (Odds Ratio OR 2.02 [1.49-2.76]), female (OR 1.24 [1.05-1.45]), older (OR per year increase 1.01 [1.00-1.02]) and live in a home with outdoor space (OR 1.34 [1.06-1.70]) or 3-4 other inhabitants (3 = OR 1.49 [1.15-1.94], 4 = OR 1.49 [1.10-2.01]); and be solid organ transplant recipients (2.85 [2.18-3.77]) or have severe chronic lung disease (OR 1.63 [1.30-2.04]). Receipt of a government letter adv
AU - Bachtiger,P
AU - Adamson,A
AU - Maclean,WA
AU - Kelshiker,MA
AU - Quint,JK
AU - Peters,NS
DO - 10.2196/30460
EP - 14
PY - 2021///
SN - 2369-2960
SP - 1
TI - Determinants of shielding behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic and associations with wellbeing in >7,000 NHS patients: 17-week longitudinal observational study.
T2 - JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/30460
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34298499
UR - https://publichealth.jmir.org/2021/9/e30460
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/91520
VL - 7
ER -