Imperial College London

DrJoSzram

Faculty of MedicineNational Heart & Lung Institute

Honorary Clinical Senior Lecturer
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7351 8349joanna.szram Website

 
 
//

Location

 

G46Emmanuel Kaye BuildingRoyal Brompton Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Feary:2020:occmed/kqaa049,
author = {Feary, J and Cannon, J and Fitzgerald, B and Szram, J and Schofield, S and Cullinan, P},
doi = {occmed/kqaa049},
journal = {Occupational Medicine},
pages = {231--234},
title = {Follow-up survey of patients with occupational asthma.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaa049},
volume = {70},
year = {2020}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - BACKGROUND: Occupational asthma (OA) is often associated with a poor prognosis and the impact of a diagnosis on an individual's career and income can be significant. AIMS: We sought to understand the consequences of a diagnosis of OA to patients attending our clinic. METHODS: Using a postal questionnaire, we surveyed all patients attending our specialist occupational lung disease clinic 1 year after having received a diagnosis of OA due to a sensitizer (n = 125). We enquired about their current health and employment status and impact of their diagnosis on various aspects of their life. Additional information was collected by review of clinical records. RESULTS: We received responses from 71 (57%) patients; 77% were referred by an occupational health (OH) provider. The median duration of symptoms prior to referral was 18 months (interquartile range (IQR) 8-48). At 1 year, 79% respondents were no longer exposed to the causal agent. Whilst the unexposed patients reported an improvement in symptoms compared with those still exposed (82% versus 53%; P = 0.023), they had poorer outcomes in terms of career, income and how they felt treated by their employer; particularly those not currently employed. Almost all (>90%) of those still employed had been referred by an OH provider compared with 56% of those currently unemployed (P = 0.002)x. CONCLUSIONS: The negative impact of OA on people's careers, livelihood and quality of life should not be underestimated. However, with early detection and specialist care, the prognosis is often good and particularly so for those with access to occupational health.
AU - Feary,J
AU - Cannon,J
AU - Fitzgerald,B
AU - Szram,J
AU - Schofield,S
AU - Cullinan,P
DO - occmed/kqaa049
EP - 234
PY - 2020///
SN - 0962-7480
SP - 231
TI - Follow-up survey of patients with occupational asthma.
T2 - Occupational Medicine
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaa049
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32307530
UR - https://academic.oup.com/occmed/advance-article/doi/10.1093/occmed/kqaa049/5822611
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/78977
VL - 70
ER -