Imperial College London
Alternate

DrJuliaSchroeder

Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Life Sciences (Silwood Park)

Senior Lecturer
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 9086julia.schroeder

 
 
//

Location

 

2.13MunroSilwood Park

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Simons:2015:10.1002/ece3.1623,
author = {Simons, MJ and Winney, I and Nakagawa, S and Burke, T and Schroeder, J},
doi = {10.1002/ece3.1623},
journal = {Ecology and Evolution},
pages = {3500--3506},
title = {Limited catching bias in a wild population of birds with near-complete census information.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1623},
volume = {5},
year = {2015}
}
Download

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB  - Animal research often relies on catching wild animals; however, individuals may have different trappability, and this can generate bias. We studied bias in mist netting, the main method for catching wild birds. The unusually high resighting rate in our study population-house sparrows (Passer domesticus) on Lundy Island (England)-allowed us to obtain accurate estimates of the population size. This unique situation enabled us to test for catching bias in mist netting using deviations from the expected Poisson distribution. There was no evidence that a fraction of the birds in the population consistently remained uncaught. However, we detected a different bias: More birds than expected were captured only once within a year. This bias probably resulted from a mixture of fieldworkers sometimes ignoring rapid recaptures and birds becoming net shy after their first capture. We had sufficient statistical power with the available data to detect a substantial uncaught fraction. Therefore, our data are probably unbiased toward catching specific individuals from our population. Our analyses demonstrate that intensively monitored natural insular populations, in which population size can be estimated precisely, provide the potential to address important unanswered questions without concerns about a fraction of the population remaining uncaught. Our approach can help researchers to test for catching bias in closely monitored wild populations for which reliable estimates of population size and dispersal are available.
AU  - Simons,MJ
AU  - Winney,I
AU  - Nakagawa,S
AU  - Burke,T
AU  - Schroeder,J
DO  - 10.1002/ece3.1623
EP  - 3506
PY  - 2015///
SN  - 2045-7758
SP  - 3500
TI  - Limited catching bias in a wild population of birds with near-complete census information.
T2  - Ecology and Evolution
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1623
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/30695
VL  - 5
ER  -
Download