Imperial College London

Dr Kevin Walsh

Faculty of MedicineDepartment of Medicine

Honorary Research Fellow
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

k.walsh13 Website

 
 
//

Location

 

Commonwealth BuildingHammersmith Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Nightingale:2016:10.1186/s40795-016-0092-4,
author = {Nightingale, H and Walsh, KJ and Olupot-Olupot, P and Engoru, C and Ssenyondo, T and Nteziyaremye, J and Amorut, D and Nakuya, M and Arimi, M and Frost, G and Maitland, K},
doi = {10.1186/s40795-016-0092-4},
journal = {BMC Nutr},
title = {Validation of triple pass 24-hour dietary recall in Ugandan children by simultaneous weighed food assessment.},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40795-016-0092-4},
volume = {2},
year = {2016}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - BACKGROUND: Undernutrition remains highly prevalent in African children, highlighting the need for accurately assessing dietary intake. In order to do so, the assessment method must be validated in the target population. A triple pass 24 hour dietary recall with volumetric portion size estimation has been described but not previously validated in African children. This study aimed to establish the relative validity of 24-hour dietary recalls of daily food consumption in healthy African children living in Mbale and Soroti, eastern Uganda compared to simultaneous weighed food records. METHODS: Quantitative assessment of daily food consumption by weighed food records followed by two independent assessments using triple pass 24-hour dietary recall on the following day. In conjunction with household measures and standard food sizes, volumes of liquid, dry rice, or play dough were used to aid portion size estimation. Inter-assessor agreement, and agreement with weighed food records was conducted primarily by Bland-Altman analysis and secondly by intraclass correlation coefficients and quartile cross-classification. RESULTS: 19 healthy children aged 6 months to 12 years were included in the study. Bland-Altman analysis showed 24-hour recall only marginally under-estimated energy (mean difference of 149kJ or 2.8%; limits of agreement -1618 to 1321kJ), protein (2.9g or 9.4%; -12.6 to 6.7g), and iron (0.43mg or 8.3%; -3.1 to 2.3mg). Quartile cross-classification was correct in 79% of cases for energy intake, and 89% for both protein and iron. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the separate dietary recalls for energy was 0.801 (95% CI, 0.429-0.933), indicating acceptable inter-observer agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary assessment using 24-hour dietary recall with volumetric portion size estimation resulted in similar and acceptable estimates of dietary intake compared with weighed food records and thus is considered a valid method for daily dietary intake assessment
AU - Nightingale,H
AU - Walsh,KJ
AU - Olupot-Olupot,P
AU - Engoru,C
AU - Ssenyondo,T
AU - Nteziyaremye,J
AU - Amorut,D
AU - Nakuya,M
AU - Arimi,M
AU - Frost,G
AU - Maitland,K
DO - 10.1186/s40795-016-0092-4
PY - 2016///
SN - 2055-0928
TI - Validation of triple pass 24-hour dietary recall in Ugandan children by simultaneous weighed food assessment.
T2 - BMC Nutr
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40795-016-0092-4
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795836
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/39280
VL - 2
ER -