Imperial College London

MrsLeilaAbar

Faculty of MedicineSchool of Public Health

Research Assistant in Nutrition
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7594 2786l.abar

 
 
//

Location

 

Norfolk PlaceSt Mary's Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Vieira:2015:annonc/mdv381,
author = {Vieira, AR and Abar, L and Vingeliene, S and Chan, DSM and Aune, D and Navarro-Rosenblatt, D and Stevens, C and Greenwood, D and Norat, T},
doi = {annonc/mdv381},
journal = {Annals of Oncology},
pages = {81--96},
title = {Fruits, vegetables and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv381},
volume = {27},
year = {2015}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - Background Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death. Fruits and vegetables containing carotenoids and other antioxidants have been hypothesized to decrease lung cancer risk. As part of the World Cancer Research Fund International Continuous Update Project, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Methods We searched PubMed and several databases up to December 2014 for prospective studies. We conducted meta-analyses comparing the highest and lowest intakes and dose–response meta-analyses to estimate summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and examine possible non-linear associations. We combined results from the Pooling Project with the studies we identified to increase the statistical power of our analysis.Results When comparing the highest with the lowest intakes, the summary RR estimates were 0.86 [95% CI 0.78–0.94; n (studies) = 18] for fruits and vegetables, 0.92 (95% CI 0.87–0.97; n = 25) for vegetables and 0.82 (95% CI 0.76–0.89; n = 29) for fruits. The association with fruit and vegetable intake was marginally significant in current smokers and inverse but not significant in former or never smokers. Significant inverse dose–response associations were observed for each 100 g/day increase: for fruits and vegetables [RR: 0.96; 95% CI 0.94–0.98, I2 = 64%, n = 14, N (cases) = 9609], vegetables (RR: 0.94; 95% CI 0.89–0.98, I2 = 48%, n = 20, N = 12 563) and fruits (RR: 0.92; 95% CI 0.89–0.95, I2 = 57%, n = 23, N = 14 506). Our results were consistent among the different types of fruits and vegetables. The strength of the association differed across locations. There was evidence of a non-linear relationship (P < 0.01) between fruit and vegetable intake and lung cancer risk showing that no further benefit is obtained when increasing consumption above ∼400 g per day.Conclusions Eliminating tobacco smoking is the best strategy to prevent lung canc
AU - Vieira,AR
AU - Abar,L
AU - Vingeliene,S
AU - Chan,DSM
AU - Aune,D
AU - Navarro-Rosenblatt,D
AU - Stevens,C
AU - Greenwood,D
AU - Norat,T
DO - annonc/mdv381
EP - 96
PY - 2015///
SN - 1569-8041
SP - 81
TI - Fruits, vegetables and lung cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis
T2 - Annals of Oncology
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv381
VL - 27
ER -