Imperial College London

ProfessorMartinCowie

Faculty of MedicineNational Heart & Lung Institute

Visiting Professor
 
 
 
//

Contact

 

+44 (0)20 7351 8856m.cowie

 
 
//

Assistant

 

Mr Jacob Chapman +44 (0)20 7351 8856

 
//

Location

 

Chelsea WingRoyal Brompton Campus

//

Summary

 

Publications

Citation

BibTex format

@article{Wachter:2020:10.1002/ehf2.12694,
author = {Wachter, R and Shah, SJ and Cowie, MR and Szecsödy, P and Shi, V and Ibram, G and Zhao, Z and Gong, J and Klebs, S and Pieske, B},
doi = {10.1002/ehf2.12694},
journal = {ESC Heart Failure},
pages = {856--864},
title = {Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition versus individualized RAAS blockade: design and rationale of the PARALLAX trial},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12694},
volume = {7},
year = {2020}
}

RIS format (EndNote, RefMan)

TY  - JOUR
AB - AIMS: Although the effect of the angiotensin receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan on heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and cardiovascular death has been evaluated, its effects on functional capacity in patients with HF and ejection fraction (EF) >40% has yet to be determined. In addition, no prior studies have compared sacubitril/valsartan with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy. We sought to compare the effect of ARNI to background-medication-based individualized comparators (BMICs) on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), functional capacity [6 min walk distance (6MWD)], symptoms, and quality of life [Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)] in patients with HF and EF >40% in a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: PARALLAX is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind multicentre clinical trial in patients with chronic symptomatic HF with EF >40%, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV symptoms, elevated natriuretic peptides, and evidence of structural heart disease. Eligible patients are randomized to sacubitril/valsartan vs. BMIC for cardiovascular and related co-morbidities. BMIC includes (i) enalapril, (ii) valsartan, and (iii) placebo depending on the type of medical therapy prior to enrolment. The primary endpoints are the change in plasma NT-proBNP concentration from baseline to 12 weeks and the change from baseline in 6MWD distance at 24 weeks. The secondary endpoints assess quality of life and symptom burden. CONCLUSIONS: PARALLAX will determine if sacubitril/valsartan compared with standard medical therapy for co-morbidities improves NT-proBNP levels, exercise capacity, quality of life, and symptom burden in HF patients with EF >40%.
AU - Wachter,R
AU - Shah,SJ
AU - Cowie,MR
AU - Szecsödy,P
AU - Shi,V
AU - Ibram,G
AU - Zhao,Z
AU - Gong,J
AU - Klebs,S
AU - Pieske,B
DO - 10.1002/ehf2.12694
EP - 864
PY - 2020///
SN - 2055-5822
SP - 856
TI - Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibition versus individualized RAAS blockade: design and rationale of the PARALLAX trial
T2 - ESC Heart Failure
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12694
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32297449
UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/78861
VL - 7
ER -